I know a lot of people here will disagree with me and that's fine, but I like and appreciate that Nintendo has chosen that they don't want this type of game on their system.

So you like it that Nintendo remains to be close-minded and out of touch with their fans, unlike Sony? You like it that there's less mature games to prevent an audience from enjoying them?

The reason said I knew people would disagree with me is because I fully understand your argument. In the end I'm one of those guys that plays video games with my young kids. Nintendo had set themselves up as the more family friendly video game option and this decision they've made on this specific game solidifies to me that at least to some degree they want to stay that way. I appreciate it.

I fully understand where you are coming from, but in the end I prefer it the way it is.

So how do you explain the presence of multiple Resident Evil titles on the system? Shin Megami Tensei?

You prefer nobody having a choice instead of you simply not having to buy it?

That's the reason I said more Family friendly. I was trying to imply even though they allow some things on they seem to block the most offensive stuff and yes to me this game is more offensive than resident evil or shin magami tension.

To your other point. I'm not to concerned about choice as is because I don't know a single person that doesn't have a PC in their home and the developers can always release these games on PC. In fact with this game they did.

But it's not a PC-only release. These developers are interested in bringing the game out to as many people as possible and they're being exceptionally generous about it with a Steam pre-order loyalty discount and placed into the PlayStation Plus IGC at release.

As Nicalis and Edmund McMillen have said they would put the game on 3DS first chance they get, your comment comes off as incredibly rude.

Look man, I'm sorry my comments felt rude to you. I'm trying to not be rude.
I just wanted to express that on this decision I support Nintendo.
Also I know this isn't PC only. I wonder if maybe I didn't explain my point very well. My point was that for consumers Nintendo only kind of took away their choice in that no you can't currently but this game on 3DS, but you can on PlayStation if you have one and you certainly can on PC. That's all I was trying to say.
I'm sorry if you feel I've been rude I really don't want to come across that way.

This is going to be my last post in the matter.

Nintendo's mindset right now is horribly behind and lacking. They cannot do everything to "protect" or moderate the content that their playerbase is exposed to. If Sony, Microsoft, Valve, and whomever else out there is having no trouble with keeping their users in line, then there's no reason Nintendo should put themselves in their own bubble. That bubble is making them look bad.

Nintendo needs to open up and Isaac would be a good step forward. Isaac has not caused controversies and people who really know about the game or at least familiar with it would try it out. Besides, there's parental controls.

http://cf.shacknews.com/images/20111223/swapnotetop_20432.nphd.jpg

Nintendo is not in a position to hold third parties to such ludicrous moral standards while they then turn around and foot the bill for games like Bayonetta and Devil's Third.

I don't think Nintendo really has taken off titles more offensive..... Have you ever played House of the Dead: Overkill on the Wii? I have....... It is the most messed up game I have ever played in my life...... It was way more offensive then Binding of Isaac Rebirth....... One of the bad guys in it likes having sex with his mother all the time.... The final boss was his mother, grown to huge generic final boss size, and once you kill her, her son climbs inside of her vagina, and she explodes......... It is super messed....... I think they could take Binding of Isaac if they wanted to, it's just because of the religious themes that they won't, because it's against their policy.