Quote
Originally posted by: Mr. Jack
I've always considered PC gaming to have too high of an entry point. I usually come in and out of the PC gaming arena depending on my current hardware setup. Most of the time I can't play the latest and greatest because it is too costly. Regardless, PC gaming really is no different than console gaming. I do prefer the keyboard and mouse setup for shooters (now perhaps the Wiimote will pass that up) and I generally enjoy the higher caliber of graphics (hardware permitting). One part of PC gaming that I've always hated is the whole installation bit. If I buy a game I want to pop it in the disc drive and play. I find companies who make PC games are usually very lazy and sloppy and will not bother optimizing games because amazing hardware is available. When in a closed domain (console), you are forced to innovate to bring a certain experience to that platform. This is something I generally find lacking on the PC game end aside from a few very unique cases.
All in all, the whole fight between the two sides is completely retarded and I hate the argument. Going to college at a really technical institute (RIT) I constantly get sh!t for being a console gamer, and it just makes no sense. I am proudly a gamer, I will play any and all systems without discrimination, from PC to console to handheld.
Nice to see another rochester student. I'm a UR student myself.
I agree, each system has its benefits. I like playing on the PC as well as console, but for games where graphics make a big impact, I would rather play it on my pc because of the higher resolution.