I figured that's the reason, but what is Nintendo getting in return? you know, other than a Tennis Exclusive and the Definitive TW to date?
I'm just hoping that since Nintendo decided not to announce so much stuff this year, that they really are planning this huge blockbuster 2010 in cooperation with the various 3rd parties.
But the real questionj is, did Nintendo delay WSR to allow GST & TW10 to shine with M+ support or did they release M+ early to accommodate 3rd party efforts? Because we all know that as soon as it was known that GST & TW10 were getting a M+ bundle, VT2009 was delayed to launch at the same time as those games.
Hm.. with how interested some of our forumers are with Tiger Woods (with M+) i think its a safe bet to say that even if Nintendo didn't really care about giving 3rd parties a leg up when it comes to sale of their own M+ enabled game, they DO care about M+'s market penetration.
If TW comes bundled in with M+ now, a gamer will likely buy it (the bundle over the standalone game because its the better value) and then a month from now when they see WiiSports Resort on store shelves, also with M+, thats one gamer with 2+ for their possible 4 wiimotes.
Obviously the more M+'s out in the wild the better, and not just for Nintendo (as a dev) themselves. This add-on to the remote isn't something like the balance board where only a handful of games can make use of it, all future wii games can make use of it beacuse it attaches to the main controller which everyone has at least one of, so the more the better. 3rd parties won't have much of an excuse to not make their future titles not only M+ exclusive, but include multiplayer as well. Look at Red Steel 2 and its lack of 4 player death match that the original had.
If everyone gets M+, nintendo will also end up making the next Zelda a M+ exclusive title as well, and thats win-win for gamers!