Author Topic: Funhouse Court: Maleficent vs Ursula: The Case of the Magical Queendom (Read 43139 times)

BlackNMild2k1 · « **Reply #150 on:** October 15, 2009, 11:14:20 PM »

It's all the Mafia players vs Thatguy right? are you the self appointed legal representation for the prosecution Maxi?

BeautifulShy · « **Reply #151 on:** October 15, 2009, 11:18:47 PM »

Not sure I would do the best job at it.

Mop it up · « **Reply #152 on:** October 15, 2009, 11:45:05 PM »

Quote from: thatguy on October 15, 2009, 10:56:50 PM

Of course, Maxi won that game, so it makes little sense. He's on the prosecution and defense?

Now that would be something to watch.

Khushrenada · « **Reply #153 on:** October 15, 2009, 11:47:58 PM »

Quote from: GoldenPhoenix on October 13, 2009, 02:35:28 AM

Quote from: Khushrenada on October 13, 2009, 12:26:09 AM
Quote from: Stratos on October 12, 2009, 07:03:33 PM
Well, that was a let down. I would have thought GP would have put up a better fight.

What's next on "The Judge BnM Show"?

I did too. I know people complained about me being too serious but with the arguements GP made, there wasn't a lot I could do for fun so I ended up getting stuck in serious mode like Easycure put it and hammering away at the arguements. I was waiting for GP to get things going by at least testifying or entering into court her early reasons in this thread for people getting the banhammer. I was expecting many things but they never came and instead we just got a lot of nothing. Oh well. Another case won by Khushrenada: Ace Detective/Attorney. It might not have been as exciting as hoped but I guess I'll take it.

And I guess my services are up for grabs again. So, if you want me represent you, let me know and I'll get back to you. As well, the Khushrenada & Co. Law Offices are hiring so if you think you have the right stuff, send me a resume.

As for what's next, we could have a court trial to determine the winners of Mafia 37: Earthbound Mafia. But maybe it's better just to let things lie there.

Hmmm, looks like it is going to be a long appeal process in the case of GP vs The Funhouse. Well, the Khushrenada & Co. Law Offices have nothing to do with appeal law and therefore will be hitting the bar to celebrate and unwind within the Mafia Forum.

Forum Felons on probation who is apart of the accused, presiding as a judge, already made the trial a joke. I don't soil my beautiful hands in such a filthy judicial system run by a felon judge with a defense attorney who kills innocent people for sport in mafia games!

Oh hey. This thread still exists. Awesome. Oh and besides GP being wrong about Easycure's nationality as pointed out in the brief trail, it should also be noted that in the mafia game in action, I did not target GP or kill her so that ends the arguement of me ALWAYS trying to kill her and also shows that this defense attorney doesn't kill innocent people for sport. In fact, I even stopped a bandwagon against Dasmos who was innocent person on Day 1. And myself, an innocent person, was killed by the mafia. The lies and slander that I have to put up. It's a shame how facts always seem to end up ruining her arguements. No wonder she hates this court. They actually examine facts here.

Let it go Khushrenada. I can't. I need to get that jab in. Why? Why? It wasn't that great to begin with. I don't know. I just want her to finally admit that she made a bloody error. It's never going to happen. She doesn't want to lose face. Let it go. Fine. I guess it is pretty obvious at this point. I just hope she doesn't drag me into another of her misguided insult attempts. You and me both. (This has been a look into the mind of loneliness.)

BlackNMild2k1 · « **Reply #154 on:** October 15, 2009, 11:54:33 PM »

Since Maxi doesn't want to represent the Players of Mafia XXXVII, the courts put in a request for Khushrenada to take up the case on behalf of the Prosecution, since you know more about the Mafia games than probably any other person on this board.

If Khushrenada is willing to accept the case, we can begin as soon as he is ready.

Khushrenada · « **Reply #155 on:** October 16, 2009, 12:10:10 AM »

While it is true that mafia law is a speciality of mine, I won't accept this case since I know the details of it and it is kind of flawed. Basically, at the end of the day, there were two parties standing: The townies and the mafia. The vote came down to a tie but it was the way that tie was resolved is how the winner was determined. Therefore, it should be a case of the mafia members vs the townie players left in the game going to court and not vs Thatguy. Obviously, Thatguy would be a key witness in the trial for either side but if the case is going to court, then it is because the court is making the ruling of who wins the game and not the host.

Since I'm invested in the townie side, I do not want to take the case. As well, I believe in host rights. The host should be able to make the ruling and have it stick, end of story. If we start case like this to trial, are we then going to bring up every game where someone has a problem with the winner? Now, if on the other hand, the host was unwilling to make a decision and let the ruling be decided in court, that would be different since he is giving the court the authority of game host. I just thought it was a funny suggestion at the time. If other people are going to pursue, maybe someone else in my firm would take the case but I wouldn't tackle it personally. Ok, this media briefing is over.

BlackNMild2k1 · « **Reply #156 on:** October 16, 2009, 12:16:37 AM »

Well technically....

Quote from: BlackNMild2k1 on October 15, 2009, 11:07:28 PM

Quote from: thatguy on October 15, 2009, 10:56:50 PM
Next Monday? We can start whenever.

Of course, Maxi won that game, so it makes little sense. He's on the prosecution and defense?

Another case settled outside the court?

We are 0 for 3 at this point. But we can start on Fri (tomorrow) or tuesday if you want.
Don't matter to me.

We can always move onto the decision for Docket #000004

Easycure vs GoldenPhoenix: The Case of GP's No Fun House?
or
The Birthers vs Easycure: The Case of Is He Even Eligible To Be President?

Khushrenada · « **Reply #157 on:** October 16, 2009, 12:31:33 AM »

I'm not sure what you're bolded text is supposed to represent. I mean, if Maxi won, what side of the case was he taking? This is why the case was flawed from the beginning. And I can quote as well.

Quote from: BlackNMild2k1 on October 15, 2009, 11:14:20 PM

It's all the Mafia players vs Thatguy right? are you the self appointed legal representation for the prosecution Maxi?

Ta-da! So, why would the winning players be on the prosecution against Thatguy. Seems to me they would be on his defense. This case would be thrown out on many technicalities. Like I said, I know the mafia law. Nothing to be gained.

The court is 1 for 3 at least. The 2nd case did go to court and the defendants found innocent since the prosecution was unable to prove their case. There was no backroom deal there.

BlackNMild2k1 · « **Reply #158 on:** October 16, 2009, 12:39:37 AM »

I know nothing of the case, that's why I was asking. I put it on the docket that way because that's kinda how it was implied. I can't find the post right now, but it's somewhere in this thread.

Either way, Thatguy stated who the winner was, and I could have sworn Maxi was the one that called for the case, therefore putting him on the side of the accusing. Other than that I know nothing about what happened in Mafia XXXVII

Khushrenada · « **Reply #159 on:** October 16, 2009, 12:44:31 AM »

And no one ever will. Heh heh heh.

that Baby guy · « **Reply #160 on:** October 16, 2009, 12:47:52 AM »

There was a Mafia XXXVII?

BlackNMild2k1 · « **Reply #161 on:** October 16, 2009, 01:07:22 AM »

Not according to the Mafia Hall of Fame thread.

BeautifulShy · « **Reply #162 on:** October 16, 2009, 01:19:27 AM »

Actually there was a Mafia XXXVII it just hasn't been posted in the thread.

BeautifulShy · « **Reply #163 on:** October 16, 2009, 08:10:28 AM »

So what cases are up for voting?

EasyCure · « **Reply #164 on:** October 16, 2009, 09:48:57 AM »

Quote from: Maxi on October 15, 2009, 10:52:57 PM

Quote from: Kashogi Y. Stogi on October 15, 2009, 10:51:50 PM
Ecuadorian I think
Stogi is correct.

You're both correct.

You can read all about it, Here

BlackNMild2k1 · « **Reply #165 on:** October 16, 2009, 01:52:08 PM »

Quote from: Maxi on October 16, 2009, 08:10:28 AM

So what cases are up for voting?

Easycure vs GoldenPhoenix: The Case of GP's No Fun House?
or
The Birthers vs Easycure: The Case of Is He Even Eligible To Be President?

and you can always add suggestions. Those are just the most recent arguments that I saw.
There was also one about Disney Villains and who would win in a fight, but I have to go look at that argument again to see if it needs to go to court.

Stratos · « **Reply #166 on:** October 16, 2009, 05:28:32 PM »

I don't think it was answered satisfactorily. GP kept making irrational statements and I finally dropped it out of frustration.

Maleficent VS Ursula would be well served by a court hearing. It's in the Epic Mickey thread. There is another Disney argument in there as well.

BlackNMild2k1 · « **Reply #167 on:** October 16, 2009, 05:38:51 PM »

Funhouse Court: Docket #00004

Maleficent vs Ursula: The Case of the Magical Queendom

Who would represent who in this case?

Stratos · « **Reply #168 on:** October 16, 2009, 05:43:56 PM »

I'll represent Maleficent unless someone else really wanted to.

BlackNMild2k1 · « **Reply #169 on:** October 17, 2009, 04:52:51 PM »

Quote from: Stratos on October 16, 2009, 05:43:56 PM

I'll represent Maleficent unless someone else really wanted to.

But who is gonna represent Ursula?

what side of the case was GP on?

Stratos · « **Reply #170 on:** October 17, 2009, 06:04:09 PM »

GP was for Ursula.

BlackNMild2k1 · « **Reply #171 on:** October 17, 2009, 06:14:04 PM »

Funhouse Court: Docket #000004
Maleficent vs Ursula: The Case of the Magical Queendom

Representation:
Stratos vs Golden Phoenix

We will be requiring a confirmation from GP before all this goes down this time.

Mop it up · « **Reply #172 on:** October 18, 2009, 03:08:30 AM »

I can fill in for GoldenPhoenix.

Ursula's the best and could beat anyone. Everyone who says otherwise is wrong.

Case over.

BlackNMild2k1 · « **Reply #173 on:** October 18, 2009, 03:38:53 AM »

Funhouse Court: Docket #000004
Maleficent vs Ursula: The Case of the Magical Queendom

Representation:
Stratos vs Mop_it_up

We can get this started whenever you two are ready.

Stratos · « **Reply #174 on:** October 18, 2009, 04:49:33 AM »

Am I the defense or the prosecution? I want to make sure instead of assuming.

News:

Author Topic: Funhouse Court: Maleficent vs Ursula: The Case of the Magical Queendom (Read 43139 times)