Wow, what a horrible article. Could they possibly be more biased? That article just annoys me because that's just plain awful journalism.
They claim that Capcom moving Monster Hunter 3 to Wii had "everything to do with easy money" but isn't that what nearly every publisher did the last 10 years with Sony? Why is that suddenly not fair because publishers are now favoring Nintendo by employing the same exact methods they always have? Businesses like money? Who f*cking knew?
Then, they go on with "Monster Hunter 3 will just be another port-over, most likely with minimal changes to the winning formula, and minimal additions..." which is a total mindf*ck of a line. How would that be any different if the game were on PS3? Moreover, how would that any different than the 3 other sequels on PS2 and PSP?
Anyway, Super Mario Galaxy will likely get shining reviews across the board. Reviewers/Editors hate Nintendo but love Miyamoto. And unlike Twilight Princess, Galaxy seems to be a significant departure from its predecessors and that has to count for something, right?