Another great episode, guys. Listening to RFN is my favorite gaming-related-but-not-actually-gaming activity.
Responses to this week...
1. Agree with "Jim" completely!! Oh my goodness, buddy. It's like you spoke my mind. Shameless plug, there's a website linked in my sig whose small but awesome community is composed of people who don't really feel the same negativity you inquired about.
2. I don't know if the crew just didn't want to burn bridges, but I was interested in someday hearing their take on why nearly all other gaming media treats Nintendo as if Miyamoto ran over their cat. Also*
3. I completely understand about the nerves, etc surrounding the PAX panel. It's been discussed in other threads and as far as I'm concerned everything is AOK in regard to that discussion.
However, I wanted to draw attention to the "if PAX had been a month later" concept. This is an issue that I feel Nintendo faces much more frequently than they should. In other words, it seems like the general media gets down on Nintendo, then Nintendo does something cool which pleasantly surprises them, and then a week later the media is back to "so? that was totally last week, bro. from now on Nintendo is dooooooomed!"
*I understand people have been let down by Nintendo in many ways over the years. But it seems like ALL companies make mistakes, and Nintendo is the only company that never gets forgiven about it. Sixaxis? RROD? Heating issues? Outrageous price tags? The PSP Go? The coveting of the expanded audience. .... they're allll distant memories, right? Historical anecdotes with no modern relevance. Yet, I don't have to go back more than 3 days to find a major gaming media site making "waggle" jabs.
4. It's true. Third party support on the Wii has not been as strong as on the HD twins. No one seems to have trouble blaming Nintendo for this - no HD, clunky friend codes, less horsepower - my god, how can 3rd parties be expected to make a good game under these awful conditions?!?!
Yet, no one finds the courage to hold 3rd parties' feet to the fire about putting their top tier games on the Wii. SF4 can run on the 3DS but not the Wii? RE4 was brilliant on the Wii, but RE5 is out of the question? Given RE4, the Dead Space Wii game couldn't POSSIBLY have been a 3rd person shooter? Really?
In fact, whenever 3rd parties DO put quality games on the Wii, they are bombarded with "why isn't this on the PS3/60?" And that is considered a completely legitimate question. For a while I was closely following interviews with HighVoltage about Conduit 2 and I gotta say they fielded that question in EVERY interview.
I bet third party games would perform better at market if the media didn't make each quality Wii game seem like such a tragic waste until an HD port might smile down upon us!
5. Totally agree with Greg on long-standing companies and their choice in game content. The saddest part is (and also the biggest the reason why Nintendo still rarely ever has me worried) is that when these companies DO try to bring back classic franchises or classic approaches to gaming, the result is often some grotesque deformity of the original. To paraphrase from The Monkey's Paw: "Bionic Commando was caught in the machinery!"