But he admitted those mistakes OPENLY in his original column. Bottomline, he made a mistake in not doing research, and wrote about his realization of this moment and his not making any $300 commitments until he HAS done the research like he should have, about his role as a prent, about what exact additional costs he should accept, and when would be the right time for him to jump in.
He admits error, corrects error, promises to do better in future. How is that NOT something we should respect him for?By the way, he has written a follow-up blog post on this talking about the reaction the article got:
http://www.siliconbeat.com/2010/01/22/how-my-wii-column-drove-gamers-crazy/#more-6211And I re-iterate: the guy's human, and "tech" is a huge multi-faceted industry. Just because you write about cover business news about one section does not automatically expose you to other almost unrelated sectors of the industry.
Are we angry at him for not magically absorbing the knowledge we all take for granted? Are we angry because he decided to return a Wii, and not an XBox360, or PS3? Are we angry at him because he didn't give his kids a $300 XMas present? Are we angry at him for regulating the amount of time he lets his kids play videogames?
Or are we angry at him for even just writing about his doubts, and sharing his experience to the world? The way I see it, NONE of these are proper reasons for the vitriol we see here!
This guy is a potential gamer, he intends to buy a Wii in the near future, he has kids who would enjoy it much, and he cares about what he's getting into.
He deserves our support, help, and a friendly welcome worthy of Mario, NOT our denigration!