Topic: Funhouse Court: Maleficent vs Ursula: The Case of the Magical Queendom

[BlackNMild2k1]

"He(she) who represents him(her)self has a fool for a client." - Abraham Lincoln

Besides, did you not read the Funhouse Court docket #000002?

[Khushrenada]

Your honor, are we going to have to wait forever for the prosecution to get their act together. May I remind you the post that started this all?

I think BNM, Deg, D_Average, Maxi, Lindy, Pale, Mr. Jack (or formerly known as), Ian, Stogi, Easycure, Zap, Khush, DrewMG should face me because I think they should all have the ban hammer!

Please note the bolded text. These defendents are ready and raring to face their accuser. However, she is suddenly nowhere to be found. Well actually, that's not true. She can easily be found posting in pretty much any other thread but this one. She seems completely unwilling to have to back up her strong words. How unwilling? My I point out the prosecution's past comments:

I'm not GoldenPhoenix's lawyer, I think she's representing herself.

Well, wait just a minute. If you are not her lawyer, then why do we have this third party suddenly involved in the trial and acting like the prosecution? Why should she even be making comments on the trial? Where is GP, the one who wanted the defendents to face her? The defendents are more than happy to face her. GP, however, seems disinterested in facing them.

If not, then I guess I may have to do it myself...

Well, now we understand Mop_it_up's role. She's just doing her best to help a friend and stick up for her. I think that reflects pretty darn well on her character. So, I will not focus any attack or arguements against Mop_it_up. She's performing a noble task. And how is GP responding to this fine act of loyalty?

I'm just stalling until she gets here, as I was hoping she'd pull up some examples for her claims.

Wow. She's just left her friend holding the bag and appearantly has not done anything to aid her friend in defending her. I think this right here says much in our trial already about the trustworthiness of GP's character and her claims. I'd like to take a moment to address my esteemed colleague on the prosecution's side, Mop_it_up.

I have much respect for you. Your willingness to stand on the opposing side with GP and without question to fight along in her defence is a worthy stance and one I would hope all of my friends would take if ever I were questioned on a matter. Loyalty is the biggest key in any friendship. But I would also never leave the burden of my troubles on any of my friends. I would face the brunt of any fire that comes my way and take the heat coming my way. I'd just ask for their support as I take such a stand. I wouldn't want to see them get burnt. My point is this, you've proven you are a dependable and true friend by coming to GP's aid. But that doesnt' mean you have to fight her battles. It will not reflect poorly on you to walk away from this and let it go. We've all seen your actions on her behalf and I've made sure that they are duly noted. But GP needs to do something to help you out now and back you up.

With that matter addressed, you honor, I'd now like to make a motion that these charges brought upon the defendents be tossed out of court and the defendents found innocent of them. As we can see, the prosecution seems to have no real idea how to proceed with their star witness vanishing and no evidence on hand to back up their claims. Although I would like to ask for the prosecution's support on this motion, I do not expect and do not rely on it and would still motion for this dismissal without it. I see no reason for our court system to be clogged up with baseless charges brought about by citizens unwilling to testify on them. We can not expect to continue waiting indefinitely for witnesses and evidence to appear. You either have a case or you don't. From what we've seen already, the prosecution doesn't seem to have a case. Thus, I defer this motion to you, you honor, and await your ruling on the matter.

[BlackNMild2k1]

Prosecution has till 12noon Monday to produce a case or I have no choice but to dismiss this case as the Defense has so convincingly motioned to do.

[GoldenPhoenix]

Why should I have to defend anything when Mr. Jack, Ian, DrewMG, Deg, Pale, and Lindy have not defended themselves against my accusations? Seems as if they have something to hide, and are no shows which means they are on the run from something.

[BlackNMild2k1]

They are included in "The Funhouse" which is being represented as a whole by Khushrenada.
You have till 12noon Monday Oct. 12th 2009 to present your case to the court beyond the initial accusation that you have already made or I have no choice but to sustain the motion to dismiss this case.

[GoldenPhoenix]

They are included in "The Funhouse" which is being represented as a whole by Khushrenada.
You have till 12noon Monday Oct. 12th 2009 to present your case to the court beyond the initial accusation that you have already made or I have no choice but to sustain the motion to dismiss this case.

I call Mr. Jack, Ian, DrewMG, Deg, Pale, and Lindy for a cross examination. Not only that since few of the mentioned posters actually visit the funhouse, I have to call shenanigans on the naming of this case, it shows an unfair bias. I demand the case be represented by someone else and a mistrial be called

[vudu]

GP has no concept of innocent until proven guilty.

[Khushrenada]

GP has no concept of innocent until proven guilty.

And no concept of how a trial works.

I call Mr. Jack, Ian, DrewMG, Deg, Pale, and Lindy for a cross examination. Not only that since few of the mentioned posters actually visit the funhouse, I have to call shenanigans on the naming of this case, it shows an unfair bias. I demand the case be represented by someone else and a mistrial be called

While it is truly a joyous time seeing that our prodigal daughter has returned to grace this courtroom with her prescence, unfortunately, she did not spend that time on law. It may surprise you to know that in order to make a cross-examination, a witness has to have first come to the stand and testified for the other lawyer to then perform a cross-examination. There has been no testimony given yet by the defense since we are still waiting for the prosecution to present their facts before we present ours. Moreover, if one does call a witness forward, it is just that. A witness. Not witnesses. We don't have people all testify at once. Please select one. Further, I fail to see why the prosecution would want to call forth defendants to testify and base their whole case on hostile witnesses when they could wait to cross-examine them when called on by the defense. It might be more beneficial to call forth a witness that is on your side.

Finally, as for the naming of the case, we can call it GoldenPhoenix vs Deguello, Ian Sane, BlacknMild2k1, etc or GP vs Various NWR Members. That has no bearing on the evidence or the case. Blame the media for trying to sensationalize the case or oversimplifying matters. It happens. Moreover, I fail to see how the naming of the case is showing unfair bias especially considering how patient we have been on your behalf to the point that we have to basically help you along in this trial while you drag your feet. On the other hand, you have shown nothing but a negative and uncooperative attitude to the whole court proceedings. You have been pretty biased on everything done while the court is trying it's hardest to treat you as fairly as possible. You want to claim bias? Do so after you actually have some evidence to show a biased attitude from the court during the trial and motion for a mistrial then.

As for the case being represented by someone else, are you refering to the prosecution or the defense? There has been no criticism directed my way by my clients who have been pleased by my performance on defense. Moreover, if they did not like my performance on their behalf, they are more than welcome to dismiss me and have someone else represent them. But that is not the prosecution's call. Now, if it is the prosecution you are requesting be represented by someone else, we've already had Mop_it_up come in and fill that role for you. But I must say, it again reflects rather poorly on the fact that you can not present and pursue the very case and charges you yourself made.

As for a mistrial, that is clearly laughable as there has been nothing done yet to warrent a mistrial. Well, except for on the prosecution's side who seem to have no idea how legal proceedings work. For the prosecution to be calling for a mistrial this early and before they even present any evidence on their case is most incredible and damning. Which brings me back to my earlier motion to have this case dismissed and the charges dropped. Your honor, the prosecution would clearly like to see my clients reputations damaged by continuing to drag on court proceedings by not presenting any case and calling for a mistrial meaning they would still have to be tried again. I fail to see how a future trial would change anything for the prosecution's case at this point considering we've yet to see anything from the prosecution. I say, shame on the prosecution for not doing their job and ask for a dismissal of the case and for my clients to be found innocent and freed from this harassement from the prosecution.

[GoldenPhoenix]

There is a flaw in your argument Khush, who says this is the U.S. judicial system this is the web? I have the power, I have the seniority, and it is going to be tried under MY RULES, Sophia the Goths Rules.. Also no one has denied my complaints directed towards them or proven them as untrue.

[BlackNMild2k1]

You have made a claim, brought it to court, yet fail to provide any evidence to back up the claims that you have based this case upon. You have also failed to recognize the Legitimacy and Authority of the Court and are hereby being held in contempt until you willing to abide by the rules and regulations of The Funhouse Judicial System.

Either provide the court with evidence to support your claims or this case will be be dismissed and all charges will be dropped. You have 3 hours from the time of this posting to prove you have a case at all.

[Khushrenada]

I've never claimed this to be the U.S. Judicial system. We all know this is funhouse court and so I am following the Funhouse Judicial System of rules. What you are describing is great if this trial were being held in SophiaLand.

EDIT: My apologies your honor. It appears we were on the same wavelength. I did not know I would be repeating you.

There is a flaw in your argument Khush, who says this is the U.S. judicial system this is the web? I have the power, I have the seniority, and it is going to be tried under MY RULES, Sophia the Goths Rules.. Also no one has denied my complaints directed towards them or proven them as untrue.

Objection!

There is a flaw in your arguement, GP. I can name 3 people off the top of my head, Easycure, D_Average and Khushrenada who have all denied your claims and made statements as to why they are untrue. In fact, they did so in this thread. You astound me at how you are unable to proceed correctly with anything to do with this case. I can see why you might now have requested for the prosecution to be represented by someone else.

[GoldenPhoenix]

You have made a claim, brought it to court, yet fail to provide any evidence to back up the claims that you have based this case upon. You have also failed to recognize the Legitimacy and Authority of the Court and are hereby being held in contempt until you willing to abide by the rules and regulations of The Funhouse Judicial System.

Either provide the court with evidence to support your claims or this case will be be dismissed and all charges will be dropped. You have 3 hours from the time of this posting to prove you have a case at all.

I don't recognize the authority of this court, the only authority I recognize is the www gods, me and Lindy Luthor. So my contempt is directed at this mockery called a courtroom and its pseudo judge BNM, who shouldn't be making a final decision since he is a defendant with an obvious bias as to the outcome.

[Khushrenada]

That's interesting considering Lindy is also one of the people you have named in this trial, yet you would recognize his authority. Therefore, if Lindy was the judge of this trial, you would abide by his ruling despite the fact that he is a defendant. I don't why it then can not work for BnM to be the judge since he is in the same situation. Except that you refuse to recoginize him as having authority even thought he instituted this very system of law. And becuase I'm a classy lawyer, I have no intention of playing the race card.

[GoldenPhoenix]

Lindy doesn't have any interest in these proceedings, he has failed to respond so I trust he doesn't' care about the outcome, and he is the NWR god.

[Khushrenada]

If that's the case, why not move for a dismissal of all charges since this case is appearantly irrelevant regardless of who wins or loses? Yet, you keep persisting in trying to keep it going. Moreover, there has been no need for Lindy to respond to anything yet along with pretty much any defendant. I also object to you stating as fact theories as to what a defendant might be thinking and for making up motives for their actions when no proof has been given regarding them. Finally, the defense has never stated or indicated that they would even request the services of Lindy or have him testify in this trial since the defense has seen no need to bring forth anybody yet considering the sad state of the prosecution's case.

[GoldenPhoenix]

If that's the case, why not move for a dismissal of all charges since this case is appearantly irrelevant regardless of who wins or loses? Yet, you keep persisting in trying to keep it going. Moreover, there has been no need for Lindy to respond to anything yet along with pretty much any defendant. I also object to you stating as fact theories as to what a defendant might be thinking and for making up motives for their actions when no proof has been given regarding them. Finally, the defense has never stated or indicated that they would even request the services of Lindy or have him testify in this trial since the defense has seen no need to bring forth anybody yet considering the sad state of the prosecution's case.

Lindy is god, so if he had an axe to grind he would have done it. Case closed.

[EasyCure]

If that's the case, why not move for a dismissal of all charges since this case is appearantly irrelevant regardless of who wins or loses? Yet, you keep persisting in trying to keep it going. Moreover, there has been no need for Lindy to respond to anything yet along with pretty much any defendant. I also object to you stating as fact theories as to what a defendant might be thinking and for making up motives for their actions when no proof has been given regarding them. Finally, the defense has never stated or indicated that they would even request the services of Lindy or have him testify in this trial since the defense has seen no need to bring forth anybody yet considering the sad state of the prosecution's case.

Lindy is god, so if he had an axe to grind he would have done it. Case closed.

Lindy theGOD DOESN'T EXIST

[Khushrenada]

Objection your honor. Lindy is being represented by the defense. Therefore, any "axe he has to grind" would be done through the proper channels. His lawyer. Therefore, I guess you could say he is doing it. Moreover, the prosecution is focusing on bizarre irrelavent matters that have nothing to do with the case on hand nor have they been able to respond to any of the other arguements or contradictions brought forth today regarding their case.

However, if the prosecution wishes to rest their whole case on whether Lindy cares, and make that their evidence and testimony, so be it. The defense will be more than happy to present their side. Of course, that all depends on whether the prosecution is actually about to rest their case. Case closed is improper wording so I'd want to make certain first.

[vudu]

This thread is so damn boring I almost hope GP wins just so you all have to STFU.

[GoldenPhoenix]

This thread is so damn boring I almost hope GP wins just so you all have to STFU.

I agree. It is a boring mockery with Khush as the head of the mockery, further proving why he should get the ban hammer. He is ruining the funhouse and putting peoples to sleep.

[Khushrenada]

Awwww. Vudu's entertainment values aren't being met. Hey everyone. Let's give a rip.

[Khushrenada]

This thread is so damn boring I almost hope GP wins just so you all have to STFU.

I agree. It is a boring mockery with Khush as the head of the mockery, further proving why he should get the ban hammer.

The head? Hey lady, will you get anything right? You started this whole thing and you refuse to end it. That would make you the one in charge of all this nonsense. Not to mention, I'm the lawyer, not the judge so I'm not even the head of this courtroom. And last but not least, I wanted to settle out of court but you made no attempt at starting any dialogue between us. You don't like me and don't want me here? Drop the charges against me and I'm gone. But as long as you want to keep calling me forth to be banned, I'm going to keep ripping into such a sad charge.

[Stratos]

I think this is great entertainment. I grabbed a bag of Cheetos and am just enjoying the show.

[GoldenPhoenix]

This thread is so damn boring I almost hope GP wins just so you all have to STFU.

I agree. It is a boring mockery with Khush as the head of the mockery, further proving why he should get the ban hammer.

The head? Hey lady, will you get anything right? You started this whole thing and you refuse to end it. That would make you the one in charge of all this nonsense. Not to mention, I'm the lawyer, not the judge so I'm not even the head of this courtroom. And last but not least, I wanted to settle out of court but you made no attempt at starting any dialogue between us. You don't like me and don't want me here? Drop the charges against me and I'm gone. But as long as you want to keep calling me forth to be banned, I'm going to keep ripping into such a sad charge.

No BNM started the thread, I started the correct accusations and you started the mockery. Get it right, geesh.

[EasyCure]

This thread is so damn boring I almost hope GP wins just so you all have to STFU.

I agree. It is a boring mockery with Khush as the head of the mockery, further proving why he should get the ban hammer. He is ruining the funhouse and putting peoples to sleep.

Or we can just go to the source and ban YOU for bringing all this on and making khush's serious switch stuck in the ON position. We all know Khush can be fun, some times, but we have no evidence of YOU ever being fun.. EVER.