Ahhh... to have a point missed so badly.
Art is for interpretation: just because YOU think a movie or album sucked doesn't mean it did, it means YOU didn't like it. Movies, music, painting, books, and self-expression; all forms of art, all open to be INDIVIDUALLY judged by INDIVIDUALS.
It's one thing when someone releases a half-assed effort, but in Wolverine Origins, despite the changes to Deadpool (again it wasn't even his movie, and WO was supposed to launch lots of other individual movies) the actors, directors, editors, sound crew, etc. all put their best efforts forward.
Also, 'decades of source material'. I ask again, why are those decades of source materials allowed to have incongruent side stories and even originating stories as they switch from writer to writer and illustrator to illustrator but the movies aren't? There are like 3 or so different origin stories for Wolverine, and I think just as many for Spiderman. There really isn't a 'perfect' timeline or even character model, only what people incorrectly imagine there is, and I find that to be based mostly in the old cartoons and T.V shows, not even the comic books.
Not saying that's you personally.
And I say again, people who read the comic books should be used to differing story arcs and changes to a character powers and attitude, they did it all the time.
You're free to your opinions, but you're not free to purport your opinion as unchallengeable fact.
Perhaps there are people who liked CDi games, I've never played them, but it doesn't seem ludicrous to me.
One man's bullshit, is perhaps another man's favorite childhood memory.