Author Topic: R.I.P. Michael Jackson :( (Read 44258 times)

nickmitch · « **Reply #50 on:** June 27, 2009, 12:31:32 PM »

Quote from: TJ Spyke on June 26, 2009, 11:59:23 PM

Depends on the jokes. With Jackson, I don't think there is any waiting period for jokes. If a someone universally loved (like Johnny Carson) dies, that is different.

How is Michael Jackson not universally loved?

BlackNMild2k1 · « **Reply #51 on:** June 27, 2009, 01:55:55 PM »

I got nothin but love for the man (RIP MJ 1958-1995), but he was replaced by the body snatchers long ago.

And from I heard, it was mentioned on the news how MJ's oldest son isn't really his, confirming suspicions that lots of us had a long time ago; He married that lady because he wanted a kid and she was already pregnant.

TJ Spyke · « **Reply #52 on:** June 27, 2009, 03:09:05 PM »

Quote from: nickmitch on June 27, 2009, 12:31:32 PM

Quote from: TJ Spyke on June 26, 2009, 11:59:23 PM
Depends on the jokes. With Jackson, I don't think there is any waiting period for jokes. If a someone universally loved (like Johnny Carson) dies, that is different.

How is Michael Jackson not universally loved?

Michael Jackson the musician might be, a lot of us can't stand Jackson the person. Whether it be the inappropriate interactions with kids (remember that interview with a British reporter where he said he dreamed of sharing his bed with other peoples children?), dangling his third kid over a balcony, or anything else. It was very easy to hate him.

It's never been confirmed that Michael was the biological father of Prince Michael or Paris (the two kids born to his second wife Debbie Rowe) and he has never claimed it. All Michael has said is that they were born the traditional way. His third kid (which he stupidly named Prince Michael II) was conceived by artificial insemination to a unnamed European woman, he claimed the semen was his.

BlackNMild2k1 · « **Reply #53 on:** June 27, 2009, 04:45:15 PM »

So he may have no rightful heirs to his throne?

None of the kids even resemble having a little bit of black in them.

BranDonk Kong · « **Reply #54 on:** June 27, 2009, 05:10:26 PM »

I learned how to Moonwalk today in honor of MJ. There are some videos on YouTube...it's actually very easy.

ThePerm · « **Reply #55 on:** June 27, 2009, 10:03:13 PM »

Quote from: BlackNMild2k1 on June 27, 2009, 04:45:15 PM

So he may have no rightful heirs to his throne?

None of the kids even resemble having a little bit of black in them.

maybe one of his brothers' or sisters' kids?

http://www.myspace.com/austinatmosphere
heres one of his nephews myspace

Djunknown · « **Reply #56 on:** June 28, 2009, 12:54:12 AM »

Which ones the nephew?

Quote

And from I heard, it was mentioned on the news how MJ's oldest son isn't really his, confirming suspicions that lots of us had a long time ago; He married that lady because he wanted a kid and she was already pregnant.

A paternity test can resolve all this. But no doubt, if it turned out to be true, they would keep it under wraps.

IIRC, it was in the Martin Bashir documentary when Bashir asked about whether MJ wanted his children to follow his footsteps, he said something along the lines that if they were to do that, to do it better than he did. Wow...

BranDonk Kong · « **Reply #57 on:** June 28, 2009, 01:39:01 AM »

The kid whose myspace page that is. Austin.

TJ Spyke · « **Reply #58 on:** June 28, 2009, 10:58:34 AM »

I think it's been confirmed that Prince Michael and Paris are not his kids biologically (at least according to a journalist that appeared on "Countdown with Keith Olberman", who said she and many journalists actually know the identity of the biological father). Jackson claimed to be the biological father of Prince Michael II. I don't know if it matters much though since I think Jackson did legally become their parent.

NWR_Lindy · « **Reply #59 on:** June 28, 2009, 12:42:18 PM »

MJ definitely lead a sad life. He obviously had mental issues and couldn't handle the fame thrust upon him from a very early age. I've never seen a celebrity who was less press-savvy...he never came to grips with how his actions and inactions would be perceived in the media. He was off in his little bubble, and because of it eventually became a recluse. He's the Howard Hughes of music in many ways.

Rest in peace, MJ. You were, are, and forever will be The Man.

Dasmos · « **Reply #60 on:** June 28, 2009, 11:45:17 PM »

Quote from: Lindy on June 28, 2009, 12:42:18 PM

He was off in his little bubble

I sure hope not.

cheep shot

BlackNMild2k1 · « **Reply #61 on:** June 29, 2009, 12:25:00 AM »

Quote from: Dasmos on June 28, 2009, 11:45:17 PM

Quote from: Lindy on June 28, 2009, 12:42:18 PM
He was off in his little bubble

I sure hope not.

cheep shot

But he was also very inviting towards others (like the little boys) coming in his bubble too.

UncleBob · « **Reply #62 on:** June 29, 2009, 12:27:23 AM »

NOT SAFE FOR WORK
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVACUjHn6yU

Sums up a lot of how I feel right now...

carolina17 · « **Reply #63 on:** June 29, 2009, 04:51:01 AM »

Michael Jackson had a very unusual life but who's going to look after his children.
Legal battles are looming...

Djunknown · « **Reply #64 on:** June 30, 2009, 11:31:09 PM »

Quote

Sums up a lot of how I feel right now...

Cool video UncleBob. Jon Lajoie summed it up nicely.

Quote

Michael Jackson had a very unusual life but who's going to look after his children.

HEY! MEDIA! Leave those kids alone!

I hope the custody arrangements are quick and efficient. After that, the media needs to just #$#@ off and let those kids be.

EasyCure · « **Reply #65 on:** July 01, 2009, 09:32:36 AM »

They won't and we all know it

Sad truth.

D_Average · « **Reply #66 on:** July 01, 2009, 06:06:21 PM »

Awesome. Looks like MJ's untimely passing has inspired Ma$e to make yet another comeback. Yay.

BlackNMild2k1 · « **Reply #67 on:** July 01, 2009, 06:12:57 PM »

Quote from: D_Average on July 01, 2009, 06:06:21 PM

Awesome. Looks like MJ's untimely passing has inspired Ma$e to make yet another comeback. Yay.

*crickets chirping*

Stogi · « **Reply #68 on:** July 01, 2009, 06:27:54 PM »

Quote from: EasyCure on July 01, 2009, 09:32:36 AM

They won't and we all know it

Sad truth.

It's not the media's fault that people are trying to take advantage of MJ's legacy and secrecy. Since nobody knows what the **** is really going on, you have hundreds of douchebags (mostly lawyers) trying to get a piece of the action. The media is trying to sort it all out.

TJ Spyke · « **Reply #69 on:** July 01, 2009, 07:39:04 PM »

Michael attracted most of the attention to his kids himself. Covering your kids head in veils and stuff like that is odd and just caused more attention. Also, it seems odd that the kids have apparently never gotten haircuts (Prince Michael II has hair that goes like halfway down his back and looks like a girl, same with the hair for Prince Michael).

EasyCure · « **Reply #70 on:** July 02, 2009, 09:49:18 AM »

Quote from: Kashogi Y. Stogi on July 01, 2009, 06:27:54 PM

Quote from: EasyCure on July 01, 2009, 09:32:36 AM
They won't and we all know it

Sad truth.

It's not the media's fault that people are trying to take advantage of MJ's legacy and secrecy. Since nobody knows what the **** is really going on, you have hundreds of douchebags (mostly lawyers) trying to get a piece of the action. The media is trying to sort it all out.

How does the media play any part in sorting any of these issues out? Yes douchebag lawyers are what drag these things out but the media is just as bad if they start invading the privacy of the children (barely) involved in the case.

Quote from: TJ Spyke on July 01, 2009, 07:39:04 PM

Michael attracted most of the attention to his kids himself. Covering your kids head in veils and stuff like that is odd and just caused more attention. Also, it seems odd that the kids have apparently never gotten haircuts (Prince Michael II has hair that goes like halfway down his back and looks like a girl, same with the hair for Prince Michael).

True but their father is obviously gone now, so he can't put them in the media spotlight (by accident or on purpose). All i'm saying is if the media wants to keep reporting on this, thats fine cuz its their right and their job BUT...

when the media starts harrassing the kids and whoever they end up with, they've gone too far (as they usually do). That is the sad truth of it.

Stogi · « **Reply #71 on:** July 02, 2009, 05:42:03 PM »

I haven't seen what you mentioned (I don't watch a lot of day time TV), but I wouldn't doubt that they've gone too far, because they are notorious for doing so. Between the media and the douchebags, it just makes it even more sad.

EasyCure · « **Reply #72 on:** July 02, 2009, 06:33:25 PM »

Quote from: Kashogi Y. Stogi on July 02, 2009, 05:42:03 PM

I haven't seen what you mentioned (I don't watch a lot of day time TV), but I wouldn't doubt that they've gone too far, because they are notorious for doing so. Between the media and the douchebags, it just makes it even more sad.

as far as i know they haven't done anything, yet. I was merely agreeing with Djunknown that once these trials are over, the media should leave the kids be (though they shouldnt be hounding the kids during these trials anyway). If they wanna drag the story out and try to follow the MJ's doctor around, or the ex wives, etc, then whatever they're adults. Just leave the kids alone is what i'm saying and what many people told MJ to do as well lol

BlackNMild2k1 · « **Reply #73 on:** July 02, 2009, 07:53:24 PM »

Caliban · « **Reply #74 on:** July 02, 2009, 08:12:48 PM »

Just watched that on Jalopnik.com, it's hilarious, but the comments suggest that this is from a fake show. It is still hilarious.

News:

Author Topic: R.I.P. Michael Jackson :( (Read 44258 times)