Author Topic: Sofia Coppola (Read 6020 times)

Svevan · « **on:** October 30, 2006, 08:32:29 PM »

Yep. She's won me over. Lost in Translation was a major masterpiece, and Marie Antoinette is a fascinatingly vapid gem that just WORKS. Anyone care to agree?

off topic: I must make two claims now: one, I was so a fan of Sofia Coppola before Lost in Translation ever came out, and two, I was so a fan of Scarlet Johannsen before Lost in Translation ever came out, and for her acting, not her boobs.

ShyGuy · « **Reply #1 on:** October 30, 2006, 08:42:24 PM »

Scarlet Johannsen was in a great movie I saw this weekend. It was called The Prestige, it was directed by Christopher Nolan.

Svevan · « **Reply #2 on:** October 30, 2006, 08:46:52 PM »

NOT A GREAT MOVIE DON'T RUIN MY THREAD

KDR_11k · « **Reply #3 on:** October 30, 2006, 10:15:58 PM »

Lost In Translation was probably the most boring movie I ever encountered.

Kairon · « **Reply #4 on:** October 30, 2006, 11:10:44 PM »

Svevan says it, it must be true!

...seriously... I'm a fan of Scarlett Johannsen because of Girl with a Pearl Earring. Seriously, I can watch that movie over and over and over again.

And Sofia Coppola is hot.

~Carmine M. Red
Kairon@aol.com

vudu · « **Reply #5 on:** October 31, 2006, 01:54:20 AM »

Lost In Translation was great, but I can never forgive this.

wandering · « **Reply #6 on:** October 31, 2006, 03:59:12 AM »

Haha, I was just about to bring Godfather III up.

Yeah, Sophia Coppola. I'm not cool like Svevan, so Lost in Translation is the only film of hers I've seen. It's the bestest thing ever.

Quote
two, I was so a fan of Scarlet Johannsen before Lost in Translation ever came out, and for her ass, not her boobs.

Fixed.

Rhoq · « **Reply #7 on:** October 31, 2006, 04:03:10 AM »

Quote
Originally posted by: KDR_11k
Lost In Translation was probably the most boring movie I ever encountered.

Most people I know share that very opinion of Lost In Translation. Personally, I loved it. I think the major problem that most people have with that particular film is that it's unconventional.
Most movies start at point A, progress & escalate to point B and somehow end-up at point C. This movie breaks that kind of storyline pacing and never moves beyond point B. It's different, but definitely not for everyone.

Rhoq · « **Reply #8 on:** October 31, 2006, 04:05:02 AM »

I love Scarlet Johannsen. I've been a fan of hers since Ghost World. I've been a fan of her boobs since A Love Song For Bobby Long LOL.

couchmonkey · « **Reply #9 on:** October 31, 2006, 04:19:22 AM »

It was a good movie. I felt like I was there.

ShyGuy · « **Reply #10 on:** October 31, 2006, 05:27:23 AM »

Quote
Originally posted by: Svevan
NOT A GREAT MOVIE DON'T RUIN MY THREAD

See? This is what happens when you disagree with Svevan. He's mean.

KDR_11k · « **Reply #11 on:** October 31, 2006, 05:47:23 AM »

LIT was pretty boring because almost nothing was happening. If I wanted to watch a guy doing everyday things with nothing interesting happening I'd buy a mirror.

NinGurl69 *huggles · « **Reply #12 on:** October 31, 2006, 06:18:31 AM »

The mirror presents a dilemma since a lot of things you'll end up doing will probably keep you from looking at the mirror.

Using "PGC poster _____" or "PGC staffer _____" would be more applicable.

Svevan · « **Reply #13 on:** October 31, 2006, 08:51:53 PM »

Lost in Translation simply showed what it's like to be lost in life. Johannsen's character calls up a friend and tells her that she didn't feel anything at the Buddhist shrine, and starts to cry. She recognizes what it is to wander without purpose - her counterpoint is Bill Murray who thought he lived a great life, and is now realizing that perhaps he hadn't. He is on the other end of life, and sees in her himself. Japan is the metaphor for their combined lostness - the foreign language, foreign setting, and bizarre cultural rules all combine, but it is when the two work together that they find at least a little contentment.

The movie is whispy, does not focus on any moment for too long, and does not unfold with a bullet point plot outline, or any of the typical narrative conventions. It simply floats, as the characters do, through a stage of life that is confusing and frustrating.

I brought the movie up because I'm feeling exactly that right now - I can't afford to go to school, but I don't want to continue my working-class job. Without PGC, I'd have very little to be excited for every day. Lost in Translation does not pretend that the questions can get answered and the problems solved - indeed, after the characters recognize how important each one is to the other, they are torn apart by their life obligations.

It's a bit poetic and a bit soft, but staggering and pitch perfect. I'm now realizing it's one of my favorites.

ShyGuy · « **Reply #14 on:** November 01, 2006, 10:51:49 AM »

Cheer up, Emo kid.

wandering · « **Reply #15 on:** November 01, 2006, 11:04:24 AM »

Svevan is correct. The movie is great because it captures a certian aspect of life beautifully.

Quote
If I wanted to watch a guy doing everyday things with nothing interesting happening I'd buy a mirror.

I suppose you, a middle-aged actor who regularly finds special connections with younger american women while visiting Japan, would find the movie boring and everyday.

Quote
She recognizes what it is to wander without purpose

Movies with characters who wander without purpose are my favorite kind of movies.

Quote
NOT A GREAT MOVIE DON'T RUIN MY THREAD

My desire to see the Prestige suddenly shot way up.

ThePerm · « **Reply #16 on:** November 14, 2006, 10:01:51 AM »

i really really tried to like lost in translation, but i couldn't stay awake!

couchmonkey · « **Reply #17 on:** November 14, 2006, 10:09:05 AM »

Speaking of not staying awake, I tried to like The Incredible Hulk and had the same problem. Movies are one part experience TIH suffered from catching me at my lowest energy point during the week - 11 PM on a Friday night.

Not to say you were too tired to appreciate Lost in Translation, maybe you were fresh as a daisy, I just think it's interesting how a movie gets one chance to make an impression on you, and everything from who you're watching it with to what time of day it is can affect that.

Hostile Creation · « **Reply #18 on:** November 14, 2006, 07:27:44 PM »

I haven't seen any of her movies, though Lost in Translation looks interesting. However, I'm willing to talk about any number of other artsy movies.

ThePerm · « **Reply #19 on:** November 14, 2006, 07:33:08 PM »

Quote
Originally posted by: couchmonkey
Speaking of not staying awake, I tried to like The Incredible Hulk and had the same problem. Movies are one part experience TIH suffered from catching me at my lowest energy point during the week - 11 PM on a Friday night.

Not to say you were too tired to appreciate Lost in Translation, maybe you were fresh as a daisy, I just think it's interesting how a movie gets one chance to make an impression on you, and everything from who you're watching it with to what time of day it is can affect that.

Hulk did that too!!!!!
I kept falling asleep watching it, I tried to watch both like 3 times, every-time, i fall asleep.

Svevan · « **Reply #20 on:** November 14, 2006, 08:07:50 PM »

Wandering, did you ever see The Prestige?

wandering · « **Reply #21 on:** November 14, 2006, 08:51:48 PM »

I did not. I was going to, but then I decided the glorious nation of Khazakhstan deserved my money more.

The Omen · « **Reply #22 on:** November 20, 2006, 11:28:55 AM »

Sofia Coppola is a mediocre filmmaker with a big financial push from her far more talented (at one time) pop. Lost In Translation was only okay.

ThePerm · « **Reply #23 on:** November 21, 2006, 12:25:31 PM »

News:

Author Topic: Sofia Coppola (Read 6020 times)