Author Topic: Goldeneye 007 DS  (Read 20212 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kurst_chao3030

  • Banned
  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE: Goldeneye 007 DS
« Reply #25 on: August 28, 2004, 09:48:20 AM »
Banned

Offline joeamis

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE:Goldeneye 007 DS
« Reply #26 on: August 28, 2004, 12:22:17 PM »
Quote

Originally posted by: Bill Aurion
Nope, I never pass judgement on a game I haven't played...  I just really don't like EA's attempts...


so... your personal opinion outweighs the opinions of dozens of millions of people, and professional reviewers across the world in their views about Zelda on cdi and the EA Bond games?
.

Offline Bill Aurion

  • NWR Forum Loli
  • Score: 34
    • View Profile
RE:Goldeneye 007 DS
« Reply #27 on: August 28, 2004, 03:18:38 PM »
Quote

Originally posted by: joeamis
so... your personal opinion outweighs the opinions of dozens of millions of people, and professional reviewers across the world in their views about Zelda on cdi and the EA Bond games?

That's the purpose of personal opinion, correct?
~Former Resident Zelda Aficionado and Nintendo Fan~

Offline joeamis

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE:Goldeneye 007 DS
« Reply #28 on: August 28, 2004, 09:13:44 PM »
Quote

Originally posted by: Bill Aurion
Quote


That's the purpose of personal opinion, correct?


Nope, that doesn't apply to what the argument was, it wasn't personal opinion but rather commonly known opinions of the majority.  I'm not surprised though because you always try to twist things around in some manner if possible.  
.

Offline KDR_11k

  • boring person
  • Score: 28
    • View Profile
RE: Goldeneye 007 DS
« Reply #29 on: August 28, 2004, 10:39:43 PM »
kurst: Hey, being negative until proven positive has the neat byeffect that you're rarely overhyped on something.

Offline Renny

  • Satin
    666
  • Score: 1
    • View Profile
RE: Goldeneye 007 DS
« Reply #30 on: August 29, 2004, 03:35:43 AM »
Watch out Bill. Next he'll be breakin' out the GameRankings links.

You 'bout to get served, sucka!
"... i only see pS2s at the halfway house so its those crazy druggies playing them." - animecyberrat

Offline Bill Aurion

  • NWR Forum Loli
  • Score: 34
    • View Profile
RE:Goldeneye 007 DS
« Reply #31 on: August 29, 2004, 05:23:00 AM »
Quote

Originally posted by: joeamis
I'm not surprised though because you always try to twist things around in some manner if possible.

Well one of my nicks isn't "Red Fox" for nothing...*has no idea what you're talking about*

While I'm out here, I might as well be controversial and say I despise the Final Fantasy series as well...Every game since 7 has been getting 9+/10, and it sells like hotcakes...So?  Does that mean I should buy it?  Not if I hate it!  To me, my opinion > everyone else's...That's something you can't take away, no matter how many links from Gamerankings you throw in my face...
~Former Resident Zelda Aficionado and Nintendo Fan~

Offline Infernal Monkey

  • burly British nanny wrapped in a blender
  • Score: 2
    • View Profile
RE:Goldeneye 007 DS
« Reply #32 on: August 29, 2004, 05:33:16 AM »
Quote

Originally posted by: Bill AurionTo me, my opinion > everyone else's...That's something you can't take away, no matter how many links from Gamerankings you throw in my face...


*Nods head*
joeamis, it's a forum for crying out loud. People are allowed to express their opinions. Personally, I don't give a crap about EA's silly James Bond games either. Generic run-of-the-mill levels with an annoying Pepsi Max attitude thrown in for good luck.

MUST CENSOR THE INTERNET!


Offline kurst_chao3030

  • Banned
  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE:Goldeneye 007 DS
« Reply #33 on: August 29, 2004, 07:34:17 AM »
Quote

Originally posted by: KDR_11k
kurst: Hey, being negative until proven positive has the neat byeffect that you're rarely overhyped on something.
...ok

Banned

Offline joeamis

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE:Goldeneye 007 DS
« Reply #34 on: August 30, 2004, 10:22:26 AM »
Quote

Originally posted by: Bill Aurion
While I'm out here, I might as well be controversial and say I despise the Final Fantasy series as well...Every game since 7 has been getting 9+/10, and it sells like hotcakes...So?  Does that mean I should buy it?  Not if I hate it!  To me, my opinion > everyone else's...That's something you can't take away, no matter how many links from Gamerankings you throw in my face...


Eh I never mentioned Gamerankings, anyways your personal opinion has no bearing on the previous issue, so I dunno why you mentioned it other than to vent your hatred of EA.  I wouldn't expect you to buy FF games either because you're a little counter mainstream- mainstream gamer.  
.

Offline Bill Aurion

  • NWR Forum Loli
  • Score: 34
    • View Profile
RE: Goldeneye 007 DS
« Reply #35 on: August 30, 2004, 11:02:36 AM »
I mentioned it because I was supporting KDR's opinion with my own, and nothing more...

"I wouldn't expect you to buy FF games either because you're a little counter mainstream- mainstream gamer."

Ehhhhhhh?  I don't buy games for the sake of buying them or not buying them...I don't dislike Final Fantasy because most people do like them...Accusing me of acting so is assinine...
~Former Resident Zelda Aficionado and Nintendo Fan~

Offline KDR_11k

  • boring person
  • Score: 28
    • View Profile
RE: Goldeneye 007 DS
« Reply #36 on: August 31, 2004, 05:54:29 AM »
By the way, the Zelda -> 007 analogy was  used to convey the fact that just because it has the name of a good game on it doesn't mean it's a good game, not to imply anything about the quality of EA's Bond games.

Offline joeamis

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE:Goldeneye 007 DS
« Reply #37 on: September 02, 2004, 08:33:44 PM »
You're clearly implying that EA's Bond games are bad because the whole discussion was about the fact that EA is possibly remaking the classic N64 GE for the DS.  And you say just because it's Goldeneye, doesn't mean it could go all wrong, in the same way as zelda had done on cdi.  It's further implied because the zelda game was an original game whereas Goldeneye would be a port or a remade port.
.

Offline KDR_11k

  • boring person
  • Score: 28
    • View Profile
RE: Goldeneye 007 DS
« Reply #38 on: September 02, 2004, 08:53:17 PM »
I was merely responding to the posts that claimed because it's called Golden Eye it couldn't possibly be bad. Until more details materialize the game could be the best game ever or worse than custer's revenge, we just don't know.

Offline MaleficentOgre

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE: Goldeneye 007 DS
« Reply #39 on: September 10, 2004, 03:25:44 AM »
IF the DS version winds up anything like its console brothers then we know it'll be playable.  And final fantasy games are sucking the big one lately, its going the way of mega man, only less playable.  After VI they got to FMV happy and way too full of themselves.  That's why the rehashes sell so well. We like playing games.  nothing against xenosaga, but even RPG gamers want to play games.

Offline MaleficentOgre

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE: Goldeneye 007 DS
« Reply #40 on: September 10, 2004, 03:32:24 AM »
Oh I forgot, EA is Damn good at what it does, you don't become the biggest publisher in the world for not being good.  You can't push out crap titles and expect to sell unless you're square.  The lord of the rings games are great, and everything or nothing is the best bond game since goldeneye.  Burnout 3 is game of the year contender it won't win, that's halo 2.  NBA street is the best basketball series out there.  NFL street has some work to do, cube owners have no choice but to play EA sports games because no one else has sports games on cube.  EA has a quality that most publishers don't, sure they occasionally release a bomb(catwoman) but usually they release stellar titles.  And release them for nintendo.  The sims(most boring game ever) will sell like snow cones in august on the DS.

Offline KDR_11k

  • boring person
  • Score: 28
    • View Profile
RE: Goldeneye 007 DS
« Reply #41 on: September 10, 2004, 09:58:36 AM »
Ogre: There's no way in hell SE could make an FMV-heavy game on the DS, the storage media is too small. They simply didn't go to the PSP because the GBA is the biggest system and SE always is with the winner (and because an FMV heavy game would drain the PSP's batteries in 15 minutes).

Offline joeamis

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE:Goldeneye 007 DS
« Reply #42 on: September 10, 2004, 06:30:10 PM »
SE not making games for the PSP?  Huh lol?

as far as Xenosaga (Namco), it has more combat time than alot of rpgs out there, and a better combat system than the majority.  personally, it's my favorite rpg, with chrono trigger in 2nd, and final fantasy tactics ps1 in third.
.

Offline KDR_11k

  • boring person
  • Score: 28
    • View Profile
RE: Goldeneye 007 DS
« Reply #43 on: September 10, 2004, 09:09:36 PM »
SE is making more for the DS than the PSP, I'm sure they'll pull support for one of them once it's clear which one wins. They didn't hesistate with the DS as Nintendo's track record is good, they waited with the PSP support a bit, I think they're thinking the same we do: The DS is more likely to win, but the PSP still has a chance for overtaking it.

Offline MaleficentOgre

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE: Goldeneye 007 DS
« Reply #44 on: September 12, 2004, 05:33:03 PM »
Squenix is going to support both consoles almost equally in an odd sort of way.  DS will get more games because they'll be cheaper and faster to make.  PSP will get the huge gigantic FFXII type games because it can.  DS will probobly outsupport PSP SE wise three to one.  But three games for DS might equal one PSP game.  IF the DS games are really good though PSP production will stop in order to make more money on the more profitable DS games.

Offline joeamis

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE:Goldeneye 007 DS
« Reply #45 on: September 12, 2004, 06:18:48 PM »
okay, from your previous post it sounded like you said they won't be supporting the PSP.
.

Offline kurst_chao3030

  • Banned
  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE: Goldeneye 007 DS
« Reply #46 on: September 12, 2004, 07:10:54 PM »
about that FMV heavy thingy... it has just been heard that the ds will be able to access data from the gba slot, this means they could make expansion packs, more storage,  cut scenes, and so much more... this SE will have to use this feature, i mean this could mean a Final Fantasy XI Online for the DS, it totally possible.
Banned

Offline KDR_11k

  • boring person
  • Score: 28
    • View Profile
RE: Goldeneye 007 DS
« Reply #47 on: September 12, 2004, 11:14:03 PM »
GBA carts are small and expensive, i.e. useless as a data storage. I guess you could put larger writable memory into a DS card a lot cheaper and distribute patches and content online.

Ogre: I'm fully expecting SE to pull PSP support if the DS sells better. They're just not sure which one's going to win so they're currently supporting both.

Offline MaleficentOgre

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE: Goldeneye 007 DS
« Reply #48 on: September 13, 2004, 06:18:59 AM »
no online patches, thats something that no one wants for a system.  Developers are lazy enough as is.  If developers could rely on just releasing patches for their crap games then they wouldn't put the time and effort into making a game as good as it needs to be.  making a PC game is different because there is no set hardware, everyone's pc is different.  everyone gamecube, even mine, is the same, everyone's gba is the same, and everyone's ds will be the same, there's no need to release patches for games, that's just a cheap way out.

Offline KDR_11k

  • boring person
  • Score: 28
    • View Profile
RE: Goldeneye 007 DS
« Reply #49 on: September 13, 2004, 06:51:57 AM »
We're talking about an MMORPG here. Those NEED patches (well, additional content, at least).