I was having a debate about a female, and brought up my Female translation theory. To this she said I was "womanizing" to which I corrected her to say she thought I was being "chauvinistic", even though I followed it up with my Male Translation theory as well.
Female Translation Theory: When a male starts talking, there is a certain type of woman, that will take in everything that he is saying, but in their mind they will replace almost all the words with what they wanted to hear, or what they thought you were going to say...
so upon revisiting the conversation, the topic may be the same, but the recollection of debate is very different than what happened. Context is often removed as well as meaning.
Male Translation Theory: When a female starts talking, there is a certain type of man, that will take in everything that she is saying, but at some point start to zone it out and either replace it with a "blah blah blah" or effectively tune it out to nothing more than a faint background noise.
so upon revisiting the conversation, he has no idea what the hell you are talking about and will probably defend the stance that you never said that.
Now that is not to say that only a female can have the female translation, or only a male will have the male translation, but generally, that is how I've seen it paired off, with a cross translation here or there.
Does this sound like something accurate, similar to something you've heard before, completely off-base, or just mildly amusing to hear as you've never thought or heard about it before?