Author Topic: Eternal Darkness 2  (Read 15462 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pixelated Pixies

  • Just call me PixPixâ„¢
  • Score: -178
    • View Profile
Re: Eternal Darkness 2
« Reply #25 on: November 02, 2012, 03:03:31 PM »
I'd kill for an Eternal Darkness 2. Kill all my servants and get committed to an insane asylum that is.
Gouge away.

Offline toddra

  • You dirty RAT
  • Score: -9
    • View Profile
Re: Eternal Darkness 2
« Reply #26 on: November 02, 2012, 03:10:55 PM »
I never cared for RARE period to be honest. They had one game I liked, that was it.
That doesn't change the fact that they were highly successful with Nintendo and since being bought by Microsoft, they have become a shell of what they were.


So what I just was saying how I felt about it, not using that as any basis for any argument just stating my own personal opinion, which I am sure I am allowed to do.

Offline Adrock

  • I’m just here for the zipline.
  • Score: 138
    • View Profile
Re: Eternal Darkness 2
« Reply #27 on: November 02, 2012, 03:19:20 PM »
I'd kill for an Eternal Darkness 2. Kill all my servants and get committed to an insane asylum that is.
Wow, what an asshole thing to do. May the rats eat your eyes.

Offline Pixelated Pixies

  • Just call me PixPixâ„¢
  • Score: -178
    • View Profile
Re: Eternal Darkness 2
« Reply #28 on: November 02, 2012, 05:26:36 PM »
May the rats eat your eyes.

You have bested me sir. I had to Google that as I wasn't sure if you were making an Eternal Darkness reference.
Gouge away.

Offline Louieturkey

  • Terrifying fantasies
  • Score: -3
    • View Profile
Re: Eternal Darkness 2
« Reply #29 on: November 05, 2012, 04:59:32 PM »
I never cared for RARE period to be honest. They had one game I liked, that was it.
That doesn't change the fact that they were highly successful with Nintendo and since being bought by Microsoft, they have become a shell of what they were.


So what I just was saying how I felt about it, not using that as any basis for any argument just stating my own personal opinion, which I am sure I am allowed to do.
Never said you couldn't have your own opinion.

Offline S-U-P-E-R

  • My Butt is Ready :reggie;
  • Score: -63
    • View Profile
    • oh my god

Offline oohhboy

  • Forum Friend or Foe?
  • Score: 38
    • View Profile
Re: Eternal Darkness 2
« Reply #31 on: November 09, 2012, 08:02:06 AM »
That is some serious overkill on the part of the courts.
I'm Lacus. I'm fine as Lacus!
Pffh. Toilet paper? What do you think cats are for?

Offline MrPhishfood

  • Score: 28
    • View Profile
Re: Eternal Darkness 2
« Reply #32 on: November 09, 2012, 08:22:21 AM »
Ouch. Like a football to the groin.

But why do they have to destroy all the assets? Didn't they legally have the right to use the engine at the time those games were developed.

Offline KDR_11k

  • boring person
  • Score: 28
    • View Profile
Re: Eternal Darkness 2
« Reply #33 on: November 09, 2012, 03:22:34 PM »
They claimed they developed their own engine while the court found them in violation of the Unreal Engine license. I suspect that means their "new" engine was built by stealing parts from Unreal. That would make all SK games using that engine copyright infringing, the usual recourse for that kind of stuff is destroying all offending material.

Offline Kytim89

  • Only question I ever thought was hard was do I like Kirk or do I like Picard?
  • Score: -156
    • View Profile
Re: Eternal Darkness 2
« Reply #34 on: November 09, 2012, 09:48:25 PM »
Is it safe to assume that SK is finished as a company?
Please follow me on Twitter at: Kytim89.

Offline BlackNMild2k1

  • Animal Crossing Hustler
  • Score: 410
    • View Profile
Re: Eternal Darkness 2
« Reply #35 on: November 09, 2012, 11:06:57 PM »
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2012-11-09-silicon-knights-has-a-month-to-recall-and-destroy-all-unsold-copies-of-too-human-x-men-destiny-more

welp, sounds like SK is done

Wow, talk about a backfire.

Dyack must be too embarrassed to ever show his face again.
I wonder what Nintendo is going to do with it's "silent shares" in SK

Offline Shaymin

  • Not my circus, not my monkeys
  • NWR Staff
  • Score: 71
    • View Profile
    • You're on it
Re: Eternal Darkness 2
« Reply #36 on: November 09, 2012, 11:16:21 PM »
I don't know, but I can guess the follow-up will involve a long run to the 7-11 near NOA HQ.
Donald Theriault - News Editor, Nintendo World Report / 2016 Nintendo World Champion
Tutorial box out.

Offline S-U-P-E-R

  • My Butt is Ready :reggie;
  • Score: -63
    • View Profile
    • oh my god
Re: Eternal Darkness 2
« Reply #37 on: November 10, 2012, 01:24:22 AM »
"May the rats eat your eyes!" - denis dyack, from his new job at the gas station

Offline KDR_11k

  • boring person
  • Score: 28
    • View Profile
Re: Eternal Darkness 2
« Reply #38 on: November 10, 2012, 07:42:24 AM »
Is it safe to assume that SK is finished as a company?

I think they were effectively dead for a while now, supposedly they're down to a staff of five (including Dyack and his wife, you may be able to operate an indie dev with five people but from the sounds of it all of the remaining guys are just management which you don't need for an indie like this), the company is just an empty shell now.

Offline Adrock

  • I’m just here for the zipline.
  • Score: 138
    • View Profile
Re: Eternal Darkness 2
« Reply #39 on: November 10, 2012, 08:03:45 AM »
They really don't have any assets either. Nintendo owns the Eternal Darkness IP and no one cares about Too Human. They don't own Legacy of Kain and Raziel which was created by SK went to Eidos as well. Dyack could effectively "start over" and work on some smaller games to bolster the company's worth that relied so heavily on the coattails of Eternal Darkness for the last decade. Judging by reports of Dyack's ego, that doesn't seem terribly likely.

Silicon Knights had a lot of vision, but lacked discipline. Dyack only wanted to make his own games which is understandable, but dangerous when left unchecked. They would be better served operating like WayForward Technologies, who are super-passionate about their own IPs, but still take their licensed "grunt work" very seriously. Not all of them turn out like Contra 4 because WayForward Technologies is filled with raw talent that, like Silicon Knights, could use the guidance of a larger, influential company like Nintendo. However, their games also never turn out like X-Men Destiny. Even if WayForward Technologies wasn't especially thrilled about the license, they would still turn out a competent game. It's give and take; Dyack only wanted to take. It's a weird sense of entitlement because he worked with Miyamoto and Kojima.

Offline S-U-P-E-R

  • My Butt is Ready :reggie;
  • Score: -63
    • View Profile
    • oh my god
Re: Eternal Darkness 2
« Reply #40 on: November 10, 2012, 08:25:54 AM »
including Dyack and his wife
I heard he even fired his wife~

Offline KDR_11k

  • boring person
  • Score: 28
    • View Profile
Re: Eternal Darkness 2
« Reply #41 on: November 10, 2012, 08:27:50 AM »
Vision is one thing, any fool can have ideas, the smart man is the one who can tell good ideas from bad ones. I'm not convinced that Dyack has actual talent, he may just have gotten lucky (or well controlled) that he didn't stick any major idiocy into ED. Sure it's ambition to want to make a trilogy but it's also stupid to make the first game inadequately short. It's stupid to go for a super ambitious project without the necessary resources.