Dress up like Jon Lindemann.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The Soviet Union was tremendously successful for a little while there. They turned a poor, backwards country into an industrial power. Who knows what would have happened if they hadn't had to funnel all their resources into an arms race. I don't know about a utopia, but it could have turned out better than it did.
Insanolord is a terrible moderator.
Who knows what would have happened if they hadn't had to funnel all their resources into an arms race.
By that logic, all the capitalist countries that are in shambles and starving prove that that system doesn't work.
Quote from: NWR_insanolord on October 21, 2012, 02:43:19 PMBy that logic, all the capitalist countries that are in shambles and starving prove that that system doesn't work.Let's examine the historic ratios of failed communist countries per total versus the failed capitalist countries per total.
Erm the only reason the USSR failed was that Reagan passed a law making Russia illegal forever. Bombing starts in 5 minutes.
That makes sense, It's just an amazing coincidence that the other Communist systems bombed out or underwent massive capitalistic reforms.
Quote from: ShyGuy on October 21, 2012, 11:10:28 PMThat makes sense, It's just an amazing coincidence that the other Communist systems bombed out or underwent massive capitalistic reforms.Like I said, the countries have become communist because conditions were bad enough that the people supported revolutions. Those countries had already bombed. I'm not saying it's great or even that it works at all, but saying it doesn't work at all after a few failed states switched to it and failed again doesn't make sense. If we see successful countries peacefully transition to it (give Scandinavia a few decades) and it still consistently fails, then we know for sure.
black fairy tales are better at sports