I'm not complaining about support. I'm not saying, "Hey look we're getting games, BOO, go away games." Whoever wants to make a game and sell it, congrats, i applaud you. But i'm not intrested in rock star.
I try and follow certain developers, because i like their games, and i know when they make another it'll probably be good. And i don't follow certain developers, becuase i play their games and i didn't like them, so when they make news ones, odds are, they won't be good to me.
Out of all my games most are from Nintendo, SCE, Capcom and konami. I have a few strays, like Quest - Ogre Battle, and Square with chrono trigger, the only 2 xbox games i have are halo 1 and 2.
If the wii gets a Metal gear solid or a resident evil 4 esq game, then i will rejoice. If the wii has some wierd developer making 2-D games, then i'll check it out (i perfer 2-D over 3D). But i just don't like Rock Star, or anything attached to take-two. Epic is another house i don't enjoy. I broke down and played Gears full well knowing i hate everything else they have ever made, and i really really hate unreal. Sure enough i thought gears sucked hard. So i stay away from now on, and i'll stay away from anything else cliffy B makes.
I know people like a massive library. I really don't. I like to play a really good game, and then i like to play it again, and again. I have beaten RE 4 almost 8 times. This summer i'm tempted to do a professonal no guns run or a professional no merchant run, but the very fact that i still want to play the game, despite the fact that i've beaten it so many times already is a testament that quality = quantity in hours spent playing. I don't enjoy the idea of quality second, quantity first. It sounds hollow, and more of a marketing ploy than enjoyment, and it is quite costly. Thus my beef with yoshi's isnland for the DS, i know if nintendo stalled 1 year, and released it themselves, it would have been worthy of its name.