So I went back to look at the early Gamecube reviews and do a few stats. By the way,
King of Fighters EX: Neoblood is listed as a GC review but it should be in the GBA section.
For the time the Wii has been out, there have been 35 total reviews, and in that same time period, 35 for the Gamecube. Good job on keeping that up!
The average Wii score has been 6.6 while the average Gamecube score for that period was 7.9.
So let's say you take out hardware reviews, that leaves 33 Wii games and 27 for the Gamecube and the scores are 6.5 and 7.9 respectively.
Now the Wii has been subject to more licensed crap and ports in this time than the Gamecube might have been so if for argument we assume that the bottom 6 are made of these and remove those to make the number of games match between the two systems match the Wii average rises to 7.1. That's not necessarily a very fair comparison though.
How about how they break down into score ranges?
Gamecube - 27 total
- 0
- 0
- 1
- 1
- 0
- 1
- 6
- 10
- 9
- 0
Wii - 33 total
- 0
- 0
- 2
- 4
- 2
- 12
- 5
- 5
- 2
- 1
Now looking at this the Wii reviews seem to better represent the average kind of bell curve you would expect from a pool of reviews. My guess is that PCG, now NWR, reviews evolved to this over time. Looking at the Gamecube review clustering I think it's biased a little high. I think the Gamecube had a strong launch but I don't believe that over 2/3 of the launch games deserved a 8 or higher, or 90% deserved a 7 or higher.
Going into this mini-analysis I figured both would turn out about the same or at least have a similar distribution pattern. Color me surprised.