Just curious, how do you mean? Did IGN watch you do your interview, and then steal all of your best questions to repeat in their own interview? Or did Kensuke Tanabe give you a bunch of lame "no comment" replies for all your best questions, and spilled all the answers to the exact same questions when it was IGN that asked? Or something else entirely?
I've personally been wondering lately why IGN merits so much inside info from Nintendo.
I mean, they're the ones who swore up and down that the Spaceworld 2000 Zelda demo was actually a real Zelda game somehow (but couldn't really say why they thought it was, like that stupid "we made a clay model" controller stuff they did), until people got this feeling that it wasn't a "demo", it was really coming, and we were somehow "owed" that Zelda game.
And then when Nintendo decided to "test the waters" by showing a picture of the new cel-shaded Zelda to the media, IGN was on the front line of groups who openly defied Miyamoto's request that the picture NOT be spread around to the public (I'm glad PGC never stooped to that level), along with IGN's clear displeasure with that game that hadn't even been made yet, and that stupid bull$%#* "Cel-da" nickname.
Now Nintendo floors us by giving the "realistic" version another shot, and everyone's so happy that Nintendo managed to keep it such a welcome surprise. And yet, I recall rumors from a few days ago, which suggested that Matt from IGN was supposedly posting
"Many Are Telling U Real Excitement, Ze Excitement Loves De Attention." (with the odd capitalizations spelling out "MATURE ZELDA") on the IGN message boards.
What gives IGN the right to try and blow major secrets like that?
Okay, I'll admit, the guys at IGN probably do put a lot of work into their jobs. And I'm not exactly gonna boycott their site. But sometimes they seem really full of themselves, and I really doubt their worthiness of the position they hold. It's like, they're big because they have content, and they have content because they're big. Nintendo has to play ball with IGN, because if they don't, the "influence" of Sony and Microsoft would turn IGN into a big anti-Nintendo propaganda machine (if the IGN-PS2 and IGN-XBox divisions aren't considered to be that already).
Anyways, sorry to go on a rant here. What's your rant Bloodworth? Spill the beans! We like rants. Especially new ones.