Author Topic: Wii U is the new PS3?  (Read 62807 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pokepal148

  • Inquire within for reasonable rates.
  • *
  • Score: -9967
    • View Profile
Re: Wii U is the new PS3?
« Reply #125 on: January 01, 2014, 07:47:32 PM »
Alot of people I know at my school definitely have an eye on the system.

Offline gaugheyad

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Wii U is the new PS3?
« Reply #126 on: January 01, 2014, 07:59:50 PM »
No, the Wii U is not the next PS3. The Wii U will actually make money for Nintendo.

?

And the PS3 does not? If I remember correctly, one only needs to buy one or two games to recoup the costs, similar to how the Wii U is now.


Or am I thinking of the PS4?


Sony isn't about to tell the truth in regards to their losses they're taking on the PS4. Just like how MS has been burying their loses from the XBox brand for years. Neither company made a penny off their last systems. MS has yet to make ANY money on gaming at all and Sony blew all of their previous profits from the PS1 and PS2 on the black hole they called the PS3. And that's without even mentioning the financial flops of the PSP, PSP Go, and Vita.


Nintendo is the only hardware manufacturer in the industry that doesn't appear to be alergic to actually making money. Meaning year over year their books actually balance out in the black. Both Sony and MS have a LONG way to go before they can say the same. Sure they've had years where they've turned a profit but just like budgeting at home if you spend $5,000 more than you make one year but spend $500 less than you make the next that doesn't somehow negate that $4,500 you're still out from the year before. It simply means that at that rate it's going to take you another 9 years before you can even manage to break even let alone say that you're even making a profit.


Or more simply put...


Making a profit now does not make up for all the money they (xbox 360 and PS3) lost  in the first 4 or 5 years they lost money on them.


What he said. ^^^

Offline broodwars

  • Hunting for a Pineapple Salad
  • Score: -1011
    • View Profile
Re: Wii U is the new PS3?
« Reply #127 on: January 01, 2014, 08:24:11 PM »
Sorry, but I must have missed all those millions of dollars in profit the Wii U's brought to Nintendo so far. Come to think of it, I think Nintendo must have missed them, too, given that the 3DS' dominance in Japan counterbalancing the Wii U's worldwide failure is the only reason Iwata still has a job at this point.

Just sayin', you can't play the "Nintendo is the only company that makes money off their hardware!" card when Nintendo's attempting to sell the Wii U at a loss and people still don't want it.
There was a Signature here. It's gone now.

Offline gaugheyad

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Wii U is the new PS3?
« Reply #128 on: January 01, 2014, 08:54:20 PM »
Sorry, but I must have missed all those millions of dollars in profit the Wii U's brought to Nintendo so far. Come to think of it, I think Nintendo must have missed them, too, given that the 3DS' dominance in Japan counterbalancing the Wii U's worldwide failure is the only reason Iwata still has a job at this point.

Just sayin', you can't play the "Nintendo is the only company that makes money off their hardware!" card when Nintendo's attempting to sell the Wii U at a loss and people still don't want it.


There is no card. That's how it is. The hardware losses for the Wii U have largely been atributed to currancy conversion and they're not very large at all. As has been said before, the Wii U makes a profit with a single software sale. Can Sony and MS say the same? And because of that the Wii U's losses are going to vanish this year.


As for your snaky comment about selling at a loss and nobody still wanting it, you have to agree that it's in pretty good company with the original XBox, the PSP, the Vita, the PS3, etc, etc. And honestly, we don't even know if people want the PS4 or XBone yet anyway. Remember how well the Wii U was selling at launch?


You're going to have to wait a while before we find out if the Wii U is the odd man out or if Sony and MS are going to be facing their own hardware sales issues once the holiday season is over and real world numbers come out.


Either way the Wii U is going to be very profitable for Nintendo. I highly doubt the same will hold true for the PS4 or the XBone.

Offline Kytim89

  • Only question I ever thought was hard was do I like Kirk or do I like Picard?
  • Score: -156
    • View Profile
Re: Wii U is the new PS3?
« Reply #129 on: January 01, 2014, 09:04:44 PM »
This year's E3 will the true milestone to judge whether the Wii U is a success or not. If sales improve by then then Nintendo will support the console for five more years. If not, then expect the Wii U successor by t E3 2015.
Please follow me on Twitter at: Kytim89.

Offline Oblivion

  • Score: -253
    • View Profile
Re: Wii U is the new PS3?
« Reply #130 on: January 01, 2014, 09:39:18 PM »
PSP being a financial flop? Hahahahaha... Sorry gaugheyad, but I think your fanboyism is showing.

Offline Kytim89

  • Only question I ever thought was hard was do I like Kirk or do I like Picard?
  • Score: -156
    • View Profile
Re: Wii U is the new PS3?
« Reply #131 on: January 01, 2014, 09:45:16 PM »
PSP being a financial flop? Hahahahaha... Sorry gaugheyad, but I think your fanboyism is showing.

It was a financial success for hackers.  ;)
Please follow me on Twitter at: Kytim89.

Offline Oblivion

  • Score: -253
    • View Profile
Re: Wii U is the new PS3?
« Reply #132 on: January 01, 2014, 10:19:41 PM »
Nope. Wrong again. It was a financial success... maybe not next to the Nintendo DS juggernaut, but still. To say it wasn't would be a total fabrication.

Offline broodwars

  • Hunting for a Pineapple Salad
  • Score: -1011
    • View Profile
Re: Wii U is the new PS3?
« Reply #133 on: January 01, 2014, 10:22:58 PM »
Nope. Wrong again. It was a financial success... maybe not next to the Nintendo DS juggernaut, but still. To say it wasn't would be a total fabrication.

Indeed, especially with it still getting new games in Japan every week, and more new games than the Wii U at that.
There was a Signature here. It's gone now.

Offline gaugheyad

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Wii U is the new PS3?
« Reply #134 on: January 02, 2014, 02:41:08 AM »
Nope. Wrong again. It was a financial success... maybe not next to the Nintendo DS juggernaut, but still. To say it wasn't would be a total fabrication.

Indeed, especially with it still getting new games in Japan every week, and more new games than the Wii U at that.

No, it was a flop. Just like the PS3 and the entire XBox line. It doesn't matter how many systems you sell or how many games get published for your platform if you never see any return on your investment. That's called bad business and for some reason it's not only acceptable but apparently encouraged now a days.

As has been and always will be in business, he who makes the most money wins. And that's always been Nintendo.

Or should I say makes any money at all???

Offline Oblivion

  • Score: -253
    • View Profile
Re: Wii U is the new PS3?
« Reply #135 on: January 02, 2014, 02:58:53 AM »
Nope. Wrong again. It was a financial success... maybe not next to the Nintendo DS juggernaut, but still. To say it wasn't would be a total fabrication.

Indeed, especially with it still getting new games in Japan every week, and more new games than the Wii U at that.

No, it was a flop. Just like the PS3 and the entire XBox line.








Offline broodwars

  • Hunting for a Pineapple Salad
  • Score: -1011
    • View Profile
Re: Wii U is the new PS3?
« Reply #136 on: January 02, 2014, 03:26:47 AM »
Nope. Wrong again. It was a financial success... maybe not next to the Nintendo DS juggernaut, but still. To say it wasn't would be a total fabrication.

Indeed, especially with it still getting new games in Japan every week, and more new games than the Wii U at that.

No, it was a flop. Just like the PS3 and the entire XBox line.




Yeah, this is just getting painful to read now, so I'm going to sheathe my sword and walk away while he's still only making an ass of himself.  I generally enjoy speaking with fanboys on this site, but usually they provide more entertaining discussion.
There was a Signature here. It's gone now.

Online NWR_insanolord

  • Rocket Fuel Malt Liquor....DAMN!
  • NWR Staff Pro
  • Score: -18986
    • View Profile
Re: Wii U is the new PS3?
« Reply #137 on: January 02, 2014, 05:12:56 AM »
The Xbox line has lost Microsoft money if you're looking at the whole life of the division, but what Microsoft really cares about is making a profit for the year, which they've been doing for a while now. I believe they've actually even made money on the 360 as a whole at this point after putting themselves in a bad spot with the red ring of death early in its life. They'll probably never make back the billions they spent on busting into the market, but they don't care.
Insanolord is a terrible moderator.

J.P. Corbran
NWR Community Manager and Soccer Correspondent

Offline smallsharkbigbite

  • Score: -7
    • View Profile
Re: Wii U is the new PS3?
« Reply #138 on: January 02, 2014, 10:39:20 AM »
Yes, PS3 and 360 have been profitable for a while. Unless another RROD issue comes up, there is little reason to believe PS4 and XBO won't be profitable.

Gaug- Nintendo posted a 9/30 operating loss. Operating losses exclude currency adjustments. That means the Wii U wiped out all the 3DS and software development profits for the period. Ironically, Nintendo made a net profit for the period because of favorable currency adjustments. That info may be useful to you.

Offline gaugheyad

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Wii U is the new PS3?
« Reply #139 on: January 02, 2014, 12:29:55 PM »
Yeah, this is just getting painful to read now, so I'm going to sheathe my sword and walk away while he's still only making an ass of himself.  I generally enjoy speaking with fanboys on this site, but usually they provide more entertaining discussion.

What's really harsh is how with so many games and systems Sony and MS have sold, they still can't seem to make any money. How is that possible? As for entertaining discussion, if you're not really interested don't comment. It's as simple as that.

The Xbox line has lost Microsoft money if you're looking at the whole life of the division, but what Microsoft really cares about is making a profit for the year, which they've been doing for a while now. I believe they've actually even made money on the 360 as a whole at this point after putting themselves in a bad spot with the red ring of death early in its life. They'll probably never make back the billions they spent on busting into the market, but they don't care.

MS isn't interested in making money at all. They're interested in stopping Sony from making inroads into the living room because that's what they're trying to do themselves. Kinect proved itself to be useless for gaming, but it's good as a user interface for the living room, apparently. Why the hell bundle something that's completely useless for gaming with your system and drive the cost up? Because they're not interested in gaming. Neither is Sony. If they happen to make any money off of games then that's just a side effect. They're both much more interested in controlling all of the media that you consume.

Whatever profits that MS has been making on the 360 recently are never going to make up for their losses from their first few years. Their losses from selling bellow cost added to what they lost from the lawsuit about the RRoD and the several billion dollars to fix that situation alone are going to take a while to dig out from under. Besides, there are no more hard numbers on their XBox division. They've buried it in a combined division so they can hide the losses. Apparently, the real numbers are closer to about $2 Billion lost each year, still.

Just like how Sony likes to hide their real hardware losses by selling components from their other divisions to their games division bellow cost so the numbers look better. Nobody ever really takes a good hard look at the books and everyone pretends that nothing's wrong. Par for the course.

As for MS not caring about all the money they lost on the original XBox, they should and so should you. Because of the huge losses that they've taking they've proven that they don't have a clue how to deal with video games. It's the same old story of throw money at it to make it better. Everyone's costs go up, developers go out of business and all of a sudden several million units sold, which used to be considered a smash hit, and a game still can't manage to break even let alone turn a profit. The entire situation becomes untenable and the industry as a whole begins to falter. Sony and MS don't care because they just want to push hardware that they can control into your living room on the backs of gamers. Everyone else can go bankrupt as long as they get what they want.

Yes, PS3 and 360 have been profitable for a while. Unless another RROD issue comes up, there is little reason to believe PS4 and XBO won't be profitable.

Gaug- Nintendo posted a 9/30 operating loss. Operating losses exclude currency adjustments. That means the Wii U wiped out all the 3DS and software development profits for the period. Ironically, Nintendo made a net profit for the period because of favorable currency adjustments. That info may be useful to you.

The original XBox didn't have any major hardware problems and MS still managed to lose around a billion dollars a year on it, that we know of anyway, and people say that is was a success. Neither did the PS3 and yet Sony still managed to wipe out every bit of money that they've ever made on games, and then some. You don't need a hardware disaster to lose money.

Nintendo isn't making money right now not just because of the Wii U but also because of the 3DS. It's selling great, yeah, but the hardware costs are still up there. That's one of the reasons the 2DS was released. They're really trying to get the costs down. I doubt they're making as much as you think on the 3DS even today. As the costs drop though, they'll make more. And the cost for the Wii U is dropping too. Shouldn't be too long before it becomes profitable as well.

Currency conversion is always an issue though. Especially when you're a smaller company like Nintendo who keeps all of their resources in one country under one currency, and liquid to boot. A small shift can easily wipe out your profit margins. Which makes it even more amazing that Nintendo has seen so few losses over the years.

Offline Adrock

  • I’m just here for the zipline.
  • Score: 138
    • View Profile
Re: Wii U is the new PS3?
« Reply #140 on: January 02, 2014, 01:05:18 PM »
I wouldn't call PS3 or 360 flops in pretty much any sense of the word, but they're not as successful as as they look to consumers. Most consumers don't know or care how much Sony and Microsoft lost and how much Nintendo profited. It should matter albeit indirectly because how well a console maker performs affects a lot of things.

Offline gaugheyad

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Wii U is the new PS3?
« Reply #141 on: January 02, 2014, 01:17:18 PM »
I wouldn't call PS3 or 360 flops in pretty much any sense of the word, but they're not as successful as as they look to consumers. Most consumers don't know or care how much Sony and Microsoft lost and how much Nintendo profited. It should matter albeit indirectly because how well a console maker performs affects a lot of things.

If the 3D0 was your favorite system of all time then you, your friends, hell everyone in the world could consider it the greatest system ever made! Means nothing in regards to whether it was actually profitable for the the company that made it though. And if your company isn't profitable you're doing it wrong.

If you're not making money, it's a flop. That's a period situation. But the PS3 and 360 were purposeful flops. Do you really think that companies as huge and varied as Sony and MS couldn't come up with a cost effective system that they could honestly sell for a profit from day one? Nintendo has been able to pull that off for almost every single piece of hardware that they've ever released.

Sony and MS have never been able to do that even once.

Why?

Online NWR_insanolord

  • Rocket Fuel Malt Liquor....DAMN!
  • NWR Staff Pro
  • Score: -18986
    • View Profile
Re: Wii U is the new PS3?
« Reply #142 on: January 02, 2014, 01:23:03 PM »
Pretty much every game hardware company there ever was that isn't Nintendo sells the hardware at a loss in order to get it into as many hands as possible in order to make money on software. "Giving away the razor to sell the blades." They could probably do it Nintendo's way, but they want to do it that way, and the fact that virtually everyone else does it that way would lead me to believe it's (or at least it can be) an effective strategy.
Insanolord is a terrible moderator.

J.P. Corbran
NWR Community Manager and Soccer Correspondent

Offline Khushrenada

  • is an Untrustworthy Liar
  • NWR Junior Ranger
  • Score: 39
    • View Profile
Re: Wii U is the new PS3?
« Reply #143 on: January 02, 2014, 01:25:00 PM »
Printers and ink.
Whoever said, "Cheaters never win" must've never met Khushrenada.

Offline gaugheyad

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Wii U is the new PS3?
« Reply #144 on: January 02, 2014, 01:54:39 PM »
Pretty much every game hardware company there ever was that isn't Nintendo sells the hardware at a loss in order to get it into as many hands as possible in order to make money on software. "Giving away the razor to sell the blades." They could probably do it Nintendo's way, but they want to do it that way, and the fact that virtually everyone else does it that way would lead me to believe it's (or at least it can be) an effective strategy.

It can be effective in certain industries but seeing as how Nintendo has been around since the early 80s and isn't going anywhere any time soon, you'd think some other companies would realize that the razor and blades method doesn't work with video games. It only works if you're not interested in making any money at all in the first place. And why would you be uninterested in making money? Because you're not interested in games at all to begin with.

I have a glucometer because I'm diabetic. The meter cost nearly nothing but the strips that I NEED to use it cost a fortune. I NEED to buy those strips to use that meter so they sell the meter at a loss because they know that they'll make that money back on the sales of strips.

How many games do I NEED to buy with a games console? If all it really does is plays games and doesn't come with a pack in, I would assume one. But I don't NEED to buy more than one if I don't want to. That's why the razor and blades model doesn't work with games. There is no intrinsic NEED to buy any more games and at that point, if you can't turn a profit from that one game, your console sale to me becomes nothing but red ink.

Printers and ink.

Except with Sony and MS you never make any money on the ink then release a new printer that makes the old printer obsolete and start the cycle all over.

When do they start turning a profit again?

Any other company would be smart enough to let their console division go at this point. MS is on their 3rd system in a row without seeing any return and Sony is, for all intents and purposes because of the huge losses the PS3 incurred for them, on their 4th. When is enough enough?

Everyone else got out. Atari, Sega, NEC, etc, etc. Why the hell are Sony and MS so adamant to continue losing money on games?

Offline smallsharkbigbite

  • Score: -7
    • View Profile
Re: Wii U is the new PS3?
« Reply #145 on: January 02, 2014, 01:56:22 PM »
Quote from: gaugheyad

The original XBox didn't have any major hardware problems and MS still managed to lose around a billion dollars ar on it, that we know of anyway, and people say that is was a success.

Microsoft had no first parties and no third party relations. They used an entrance strategy where they knew they were going to lose money initially. They are now fully entrenched in the industry and profitable.

Quote
Neither did the PS3 and yet Sony still managed to wipe out every bit of money that they've ever made on games, and then some. You don't need a hardware disaster to lose money.

Sony made the mistake of thinking people would pay $300 extra for a blue ray player. It was a bad plan. Bad plans can cause you to lose money, I don't see a bad plan this round.

They didn't try to lose money and I dont understand why people think Microsoft and Sony intentionally lose money other than the original Xbox.  These are investor owned companies who only evaluate executives based on profit. Read their financials and you'll get an idea of how important it is for these investments to turn a profit.

Quote
Nintendo isn't making money right now not just because of the Wii U but also because of the 3DS. It's selling great, yeah, but the hardware costs are still up there. That's one of the reasons the 2DS was released. They're really trying to get the costs down. I doubt they're making as much as you think on the 3DS even today. As the costs drop though, they'll make more. And the cost for the Wii U is dropping too. Shouldn't be too long before it becomes profitable as well.

Jigga what?  You think the 3DS is unprofitable?  You should read Iwata's quarterly comments. He clearly blames the financial struggles on the Wii U while having a 3DS love affair. He says fun comments like needing to see how the Wii U does over the holiday before deciding a long term plan for the Wii U. I'd think he'd be a little more upbeat about it if it were close to making a profit.

Quote
Currency conversion is always an issue though. Especially when you're a smaller company like Nintendo who keeps all of their resources in one country under one currency, and liquid to boot. A small shift can easily wipe out your profit margins. Which makes it even more amazing that Nintendo has seen so few losses over the years.

You don't understand currency conversion's impact on Nintendo. They keep a broad amount of cash in dollars and euros since they do business there. These get revalued back to yen and that change in value impacts Nintendo, not the money they hold as yen. The money held as yen will never have gains/loss associated with it since they report in yen.

Offline gaugheyad

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Wii U is the new PS3?
« Reply #146 on: January 02, 2014, 02:25:22 PM »
Microsoft had no first parties and no third party relations. They used an entrance strategy where they knew they were going to lose money initially. They are now fully entrenched in the industry and profitable.

http://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-earns-2-billion-per-year-from-android-patent-royalties-2013-11

As I've said before, you really need to take a good look at those books.

Besides, Nintendo didn't have any real 1st or 3rd party relations either when they started with the NES in what everyone was calling a dead industry. Didn't stop them from posting amazing profits from day one.

Quote
Sony made the mistake of thinking people would pay $300 extra for a blue ray player. It was a bad plan. Bad plans can cause you to lose money, I don't see a bad plan this round.

They didn't try to lose money and I dont understand why people think Microsoft and Sony intentionally lose money other than the original Xbox.  These are investor owned companies who only evaluate executives based on profit. Read their financials and you'll get an idea of how important it is for these investments to turn a profit.

No, they're not actively trying to lose money. That would be insane. But it does sound funny and grab attention, especially since no one seems to be able to come up with a better reason.

What it is is their actual goals have nothing to do with games. So their games systems are really their loss leaders until they get to where they really want to get, which is entrenched in your living room and you paying them for every bit of media that flows into your home. Why else would a company like MS be willing to loose so much over so many years with no sign of a return in sight?

Quote
Jigga what?  You think the 3DS is unprofitable?  You should read Iwata's quarterly comments. He clearly blames the financial struggles on the Wii U while having a 3DS love affair. He says fun comments like needing to see how the Wii U does over the holiday before deciding a long term plan for the Wii U. I'd think he'd be a little more upbeat about it if it were close to making a profit.

I never said the 3DS was unprofitable. I said that it's not making the kinds of profits that a lot of people seem to be assuming that it is. When they dropped the price they started selling at a loss, and it took them a while to make up that loss. We're now looking at 3 different 3DS versions on the market at one time ranging from $129 to $199. Nintendo is currently trying to scrape the market from both ends because it's not turning the kinds of profits that they were hoping it would by now. Hell, even Iwata himself stated that he's been disappointed with sales outside of Japan.

Quote
You don't understand currency conversion's impact on Nintendo. They keep a broad amount of cash in dollars and euros since they do business there. These get revalued back to yen and that change in value impacts Nintendo, not the money they hold as yen. The money held as yen will never have gains/loss associated with it since they report in yen.

I understand that but Nintendo still holds most of their currency in Yen and any fluctuations in the market can still greatly impact their resources and profitability.

Offline smallsharkbigbite

  • Score: -7
    • View Profile
Re: Wii U is the new PS3?
« Reply #147 on: January 02, 2014, 03:51:40 PM »

http://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-earns-2-billion-per-year-from-android-patent-royalties-2013-11

As I've said before, you really need to take a good look at those books.

There is no way for me or anyone to look into the books because Microsoft doesn't publish them. A fun article to generate hits but can't be proven. I think the math is a little fuzzy too. The division is on track for 1B profit. Back out 2B in royalties and you are at 1 B loss. Yet somehow xbox is responsible for 2B loss?  Did the windows phone make 1 B profit? 

Mehdi has said the XBO will break even on day one and tear downs support that.

But it doesn't really matter if Xbox is a failure or not. You seem to be implying that because the competitors are wrong, Nintendo is right. Nintendo is losing money and the Wii U is being rejected by the market. They are not in a good position even if their main competitors are screwing up.

Quote
Besides, Nintendo didn't have any real 1st or 3rd party relations either when they started with the NES in what everyone was calling a dead industry. Didn't stop them from posting amazing profits from day one.

Do I need to explain competition?  NES had none, Xbox had strong competitors. The 2 situations are completely different. And Nintendo did have game development experience with arcades ( DK) and game and watch.
 
Quote
What it is is their actual goals have nothing to do with games. So their games systems are really their loss leaders until they get to where they really want to get, which is entrenched in your living room and you paying them for every bit of media that flows into your home. Why else would a company like MS be willing to loose so much over so many years with no sign of a return in sight?

That's speculative. Microsoft's biggest profits come from supporting businesses. I think dont think xbox is as unprofitable as you think and I dont think they'd be willing to support it indefinitely with losses. Apple/Amazon are their closest competitors in the cloud realm and they get by fine without dedicated gaming devices.

Quote
I never said the 3DS was unprofitable. I said that it's not making the kinds of profits that a lot of people seem to be assuming that it is. When they dropped the price they started selling at a loss, and it took them a while to make up that loss. We're now looking at 3 different 3DS versions on the market at one time ranging from $129 to $199. Nintendo is currently trying to scrape the market from both ends because it's not turning the kinds of profits that they were hoping it would by now. Hell, even Iwata himself stated that he's been disappointed with sales outside of Japan.

Yes, Iwata was disappointed in 3DS sales in 2011. I haven't heard him say he is now. 3DS hasn't dropped in price in 2.5 years and I can't believe it isn't raking in the dough. 2DS is just a good business move and not indicative that they are unsatisfied with the 3DS.

Quote
I understand that but Nintendo still holds most of their currency in Yen and any fluctuations in the market can still greatly impact their resources and profitability.

See when you say things like that it makes me think you dont understand. If Nintendo held 100% of their cash in yen they would never be subject to currency gains/losses. Yen holdings mitigate the risk, they dont expose them to more risk.
« Last Edit: January 02, 2014, 03:55:17 PM by smallsharkbigbite »

Offline MagicCow64

  • Still no title
  • Score: 9
    • View Profile
Re: Wii U is the new PS3?
« Reply #148 on: January 02, 2014, 04:19:52 PM »

 
Quote
Quote
What it is is their actual goals have nothing to do with games. So their games systems are really their loss leaders until they get to where they really want to get, which is entrenched in your living room and you paying them for every bit of media that flows into your home. Why else would a company like MS be willing to loose so much over so many years with no sign of a return in sight?

That's speculative. Microsoft's biggest profits come from supporting businesses. I think dont think xbox is as unprofitable as you think and I dont think they'd be willing to support it indefinitely with losses. Apple/Amazon are their closest competitors in the cloud realm and they get by fine without dedicated gaming devices.




I think it's pretty clear that MS doesn't have the healthiest idea of what they're doing in the gaming space. Their operational mode in the last decade has been to blow massive profit from enterprise on speculative ventures attempting to leech market share from established competitors. They're blowing billions eve3ry year on Bing with no hope of ever turning that around, with no end in site. Now that Ballmer's out we might see a rethinking of this late stage capitalism "sell at a loss on make it up in volume" nonsense that only actually seems to work for Amazon.

Offline smallsharkbigbite

  • Score: -7
    • View Profile
Re: Wii U is the new PS3?
« Reply #149 on: January 02, 2014, 04:24:18 PM »
It's fair to say they haven't gotten the results they expected. I think that's different than saying they don't care about making profits on games.