Does anybody else get that feeling? No console ever had more than two Zelda games on it. Yet, the GCN is getting four Zeldas. Or five, if you want to be technical.
The Wind Waker
The Four Swords
Tetra's Trackers
The Wind Waker 2 (tentative title)
Ocarina Of Time: Master Quest (technical one)
I do not mind Master Quest, The Wind Waker, or the sequel to the Wind Waker, but The Four Swords and Tetra's Trackers. But The Four Swords and Tetra's Trackers? C'mon...I know both of them were meant to help with GBA connectivity, but they sound like milkers. One is somewhat of a party title, and the other is a definite party title.
Before the GCN, all Zeldas (except for the horse manure that were the Philips versions and The Four Swords GBA) were massive adventures that sucked players into worlds that were unique only to Zelda. The Four Swords was an exception, but it did also contain the port of LTTP. And it is not on the main console.
However, the Four Swords GCN and Tetra's Trackers are. The Four Swords, from what I hear, is a fun title, but it is not a massive spectacle we all come to expect from the main console Zeldas. Even so, this would not be enough evidence of Zelda getting milked if Tetra's Trackers did not come into play at the same time. That is just a blatent party game so far.
I do not want to see the series many esteem for being the best get milked. Metroid is not getting this treatment, so why is Zelda? They are Nintendo's two best series quality-wise (Mario has too many titles. As many quality titles he has, he has lots of crap titles as well, sadly) by the fans and critics alike, so they should not be marred with any side titles. If they want to have gaidens of the series, that is all right, but no side titles like "Zelda Party."