Topic: Resident Evil: Revelations to Cost $50

[King Bowser Koopa]

This is actually a discount of some $20-30 for Australian handheld games.
Because of this, however, the game will retail for $99 AUD when it comes here. I guarantee it.

I'm still glad I imported my 3DS.

[xcwarrior]

NO! Bad Capcom! Bad!

Between this and still no US date for Monster Hunter, Capcom is on my **** list right now.

[Adrock]

I'm pushing the shenanigans broom on anyone who says $50 is too much for a handheld game. What about handheld games makes them inherently worth less than console games? They've come a long way since the original Gameboy. I can see thinking that a game, handheld or console, is not worth $50 or $60 because it sucks or because it's too short or any number of reasons outside of platform. A game's value should be judged on the merits of its content, not which platform it's on.

As excited as I am for Resident Evil Jill, I am disappointed that this game didn't come out on the Wii. It's a console game. Nothing that I've seen so far has shown that it takes advantage of it being on a handheld system. Granted, I haven't played it so I can't say for sure, but it looks like a game you have to sit down and play for an extended period of time which isn't conducive of quick, on-the-go gaming... the type of experience handhelds excel at. The original DS changed handheld gaming. Many games offered a unique experience that could not be done the same way on a home console. Once home console experiences started showing up on handhelds, one has to wonder why those games just weren't made for a console instead. Revelations is one such game. I'd rather play it on my 40" TV. So, personally, a game like Revelations is worth $50 because it's packed with content, but I can't help but wonder how much better this game would be on the Wii, especially with motion controls. RE4 was better for it. I have no doubt this game would be as well.

[Ymeegod]

Add why do people think because it's an handheld is should be valved lower than it's console ones?  In the past handheld games tended to be inferior to it's consoles counterpart but now there's plente of Quality titles on handhelds that are justifield at that price IMO.

And you have to see things from a business angle, mature rated titles on handhelds don't see all that well to begin so you really don't get the revenue to spend on extra costs.

I wonder if the US is going get the analog stick bundle? 
------------------
LOL Adrock beat me to the punch .
 
 

[broodwars]

I'm pushing the shenanigans broom on anyone who says $50 is too much for a handheld game. What about handheld games makes them inherently worth less than console games?

I can't play them on my considerably larger TV with a good sound system and a proper (and comfortable) controller in my hand.  That alone will always make a handheld inferior to a console, unless (of course) you can hook that handheld up to a TV and play games at a proper resolution with a controller.

[Adrock]

That makes the handheld inferior to the console (as in the hardware), but that doesn't necessarily mean the actual game is worth less. I don't think as many people would balk at the price if the game came out on the Wii. That's the point being made here. The game itself is worth $50 so it's silly that people are complaining that a 3DS game costs that much because on a home console, the price would be acceptable.

[Retro Deckades]

Willing to charge $50 for a true console experience on a handheld, yet not willing to make it a numbered entry in the series. Hmmm...

[Manthony Chopkins]

Amazon has the pre-order for this game listed at 40$ right now.


http://www.amazon.com/Resident-Evil-Revelations-Nintendo-3DS/dp/B0050SVLI2/ref=sr_1_1?s=videogames&ie=UTF8&qid=1320209231&sr=1-1




Edit: Beaten

[broodwars]

Willing to charge $50 for a true console experience on a handheld, yet not willing to make it a numbered entry in the series. Hmmm...

Honestly, I prefer companies using subtitles once a series has gone on this long.  Just look at Final Fantasy to see just how ridiculous the titles start looking once there are enough numbered sequels.

[Adrock]

Willing to charge $50 for a true console experience on a handheld, yet not willing to make it a numbered entry in the series. Hmmm...

I addressed that in another thread so I'll just quote myself.

Does it even matter whether Revelations isn't a numbered entry? Capcom doesn't seem to have a system for which games deserve a numbered title. Code Veronica is arguably more important than Resident Evil 3 plot wise and didn't receive a number. It could have been either numbered 3 or 4 depending on how you view Nemesis. Apparently, the only reason Nemesis was given a numbered title is because it was on Playstation. Revelations is an interquel with 2 returning characters who we know make it to RE5. Despite its title, I'm curious what could possibly be revealed in this game that could blow the entire series' plot wide open, if anything. It seems more like a side-story that doesn't and won't affect the greater story arc of the series.

I wouldn't pay too much attention to which games get a number. It makes no sense anyway. The final scenario of Umbrella Chronicles is pretty important to the canon and it's not covered in any other RE game. Capcom probably could have made an entire game based on that chapter.

[NWR_insanolord]

(C) Amazon.com Pre-Order Price Guarantee "the price we charge when we ship it to you will be the lowest price offered by Amazon.com between the time you placed your order and the end of the day of the release date."  It's listed at 39.99 still.........
........or does this only apply if the price DECREASES ?   I don't know myself. 

I just checked, and Amazon lists the price as $39.99 while acknowledging the regular price will be $49.99, so if you want it for $40 order it now. I just did.

[famicomplicated]

I was about to say, I doubt it will be $50 on most online stores.
Look out for discounts, vouchers etc, I'd be surprised if any of us will be paying that price in the end.


I wonder how much it will be in Japan.. 4,900, 5,800, 6,800!!!?

[Ymeegod]

5990 yen (about US$78) non-bundled.

Same price as old DS titles like Dragon Quest IX.

[GoldenPhoenix]

That makes the handheld inferior to the console (as in the hardware), but that doesn't necessarily mean the actual game is worth less. I don't think as many people would balk at the price if the game came out on the Wii. That's the point being made here. The game itself is worth $50 so it's silly that people are complaining that a 3DS game costs that much because on a home console, the price would be acceptable.

The fact still remains people perceive handheld games as inferior, believe me I understand and agree that handheld games can be on the same level as console games, but the marketplace says otherwise (and has been saying otherwise). That is what is most important at the end of the day, if Capcom can actually sell the game. Perception is not always logical.

[ThePerm]

eh, i payed 24 dollars for a couple of capcom new releases before, so because i got that extra low price on those games from them i dont mind paying the inflated price for a seperate game.

[leahsdad]

Amazon has the pre-order for this game listed at 40$ right now.


http://www.amazon.com/Resident-Evil-Revelations-Nintendo-3DS/dp/B0050SVLI2/ref=sr_1_1?s=videogames&ie=UTF8&qid=1320209231&sr=1-1




Edit: Beaten

Nice Manthony.  Just put in my pre-order. 

Now I just hope this doesn't suck like RE5.  Well, "suck" is a harsh.  "Bore me to tears" may be better.   I liked Mercenaries 3D so much more, because there was none of that ludicrous story crap or cutscenes.  Just combat.   It was like gameplay porn.

[Ceric]

I'm pushing the shenanigans broom on anyone who says $50 is too much for a handheld game. What about handheld games makes them inherently worth less than console games? They've come a long way since the original Gameboy. I can see thinking that a game, handheld or console, is not worth $50 or $60 because it sucks or because it's too short or any number of reasons outside of platform. A game's value should be judged on the merits of its content, not which platform it's on.

As excited as I am for Resident Evil Jill, I am disappointed that this game didn't come out on the Wii. It's a console game. Nothing that I've seen so far has shown that it takes advantage of it being on a handheld system. Granted, I haven't played it so I can't say for sure, but it looks like a game you have to sit down and play for an extended period of time which isn't conducive of quick, on-the-go gaming... the type of experience handhelds excel at. The original DS changed handheld gaming. Many games offered a unique experience that could not be done the same way on a home console. Once home console experiences started showing up on handhelds, one has to wonder why those games just weren't made for a console instead. Revelations is one such game. I'd rather play it on my 40" TV. So, personally, a game like Revelations is worth $50 because it's packed with content, but I can't help but wonder how much better this game would be on the Wii, especially with motion controls. RE4 was better for it. I have no doubt this game would be as well.

I'm a little confused by this Adrock.

Part 1:
Why can't a console Experience be on Handheld?

Part 2:
You shouldn't have a Console Experience on Handheld.

You seem to contradict your own argument.

Honestly speaking I think this particular genre, Horror portion in specific, can benefit from the set form factor of the Handheld.  Also I know for the demographic of people who do not live alone this style of game normally isn't appealing for other parties to let you monopolize the TV for.  I think its perfectly suited for the handheld.  I need to stop I just close the lid.  I want to play while my son watches GeoTrax I just pop it open and put on some headphones.

Handhelds have the power to be viable alternatives in there own rights now and while its great to get that good usage out of your big TV and surround system its not necessarily essential.  I mean how many people here do PC gaming on a full surround system using a 40+ inch screen?  Most tend to use maybe dual monitors and a set of good headphones.  Even prefer it that way.

If you make me a Console quality and sized game on a handheld that's great and it should demand that sort of price.   One day it probably will.

Also the PSP allows you to play your mobile games on the big screen using a PS3 controller.

[ejamer]

Everything I've seen about this game suggests that the price will be justified. Especially when you compare it to the games currently available on 3DS and consider the level of excitement that Revelations is currently generating among gamers.


In the end, charging more doesn't really affect my purchasing decision: $50 is a lot of scratch but not a meaningful increase from $40. (Neither price is casual/impulse purchase territory, which makes sense given the quality and nature of the game.)

[ejamer]

I hope this game sells well because Capcom needs to be rewarded for doing such a spectacular job on developing for the 3DS. I see this games as not only what the potential of the 3DS itself can do, but what a third party can do if they put actual effort into developing for a system. I hope it sells a million copies.

Totally agree.

Capcom doesn't always hit the mark - consider the silly save system for RE:Mercenaries - but everything that I see about RE:Revelations and Monster Hunter games coming out for 3DS makes me genuinely excited. These games appear to be the type of blockbusters that move systems and engross gamers for hundreds of hours. If that isn't worth rewarding by buying new, then I don't know what is.




(Edit: Sorry for the double post. Really wanted to agree with this point though. So far this looks like the first real showpiece game for 3DS - arguably moreso than anything Nintendo has in the pipe.)

[Adrock]

I'm a little confused by this Adrock.

Part 1:
Why can't a console Experience be on Handheld?

Part 2:
You shouldn't have a Console Experience on Handheld.

You seem to contradict your own argument.

It's not contradictory. I didn't say a console experience can't be on a handheld. It can. Why not? If a company wants to release what is essentially a console game on a handheld platform, said company is certainly within its right to do so. If it happens to be a game I want to play (in this case, Revelations), I'll buy it if I have the platform to play it on, but that doesn't mean I still wouldn't prefer that it was on a console. It seems silly to put a console game on a handheld without making use of its advantages. If a company released the same exact game on a handheld and console simultaneously, I would always get the console version. That's just personal preference. I'm not arguing over it's right to exist.

I'm mainly taking issue with people who think games are automatically worth less if they're on a handheld. I don't believe platform dictates value. The game itself dictates its value and I'll only pay as much as I think a game is worth. I would pay $50 for Resident Evil: Revelations on the any platform because I think it's worth $50. Had the game been released on the Wii instead, no one would be questioning the price.

[broodwars]

Also the PSP allows you to play your mobile games on the big screen using a PS3 controller.

No, it doesn't.  While you can hook up a PSP to a TV to display games (and from my own experience doing that, the quality of that experience varies greatly depending on the game), only the PSP GO supports the Dualshock 3 controller as an input device as far as I'm aware.  And no one owns a PSP GO for good reason since it's a pretty crappy handheld.  Resistance 2 can also interface with a connected PSP to allow you to play Resistance Retribution with a Dualshock, but that requires that not only both systems are on but that your PS3 is in Resistance 2 the entire time.

That's why I'm looking forward to the Vita, as it'll probably not only look better hooked up to a TV but it'll probably have Dualshock support as well so I can play my console-like handheld games like console games.

[Ymeegod]

Vita doesn't support TV Out according to Sony. 

[broodwars]

Vita doesn't support TV Out according to Sony.

That would be an unfortunate oversight.

[Ceric]

Vita doesn't support TV Out according to Sony.

That would be an unfortunate oversight.

PSP Go is still a PSP.
Vita doesn't have TV Support.  That has been confirmed. Best you could hope for is maybe through the PS3 and if Developers use the inputs on the system you couldn't use a dual shock anyways.

[ejamer]

Vita doesn't support TV Out according to Sony.

That would be an unfortunate oversight.

Or an indication that so few people used the feature it wasn't worth carrying over.

Most people who want a console experience (ie: big screen and surround sound speakers, not type of game) choose to buy and play console games. While it's nice to have a TV out option, not many people are willing to pay for it and the Vita is already an expensive piece of tech.