Quote
Originally posted by: Arbok
He's still Link though. There is a difference between changing a character's appearance to match what they looked like last in a video game, versus removing characters altogether simply because their games are no longer "current."
But is that the case in the eyes of the new developer?
I mention Fire Emblem because it's the only series which has replaceable characters. Roy was supposed to be the hero of the first FE game which made it stateside, which tells me that they understand the advertising benefits of placing characters in the game who have current games out.
Are there people who are more likely to try Twilight Princess, Zero Mission, Wario Ware, Kirby Wii, etc. because the characters are in the game? Of course they are.
Knowing that Wii will likely have a FE game within the first six months, I'd be stunned if there wasn't at LEAST 1 FE character from FE Wii in SSBB. They likely will axe Roy because he was supposed to represent the "current", but I wouldn't be shocked if they both got the axe in favor of two new FE characters (possibly a hero and a villain).
It's silly to argue about it as it's not like WE can change the outcome. I'm just saying that if this new dev has suggested that not all characters will return, then everything is up in the air.
Also, I know the flag doesn't match, but I highly doubt it's Marth's kingdom. The castle flies red flags with a black dragon. Red and Black are flag colors typically used for villains in FE and dragons are used by villains as flying mounts.