Refer to
www.planetgamecube.com report on Analysts recommending Nintendo should go 3rd Party.
Motto: We are ANALysts and we like to play with our rectum. Every single time the Big N has a technology breakthrough eg. Showcasing Triforce, many alarmists/ANALysts will try to undermine the Big N.
More recently Big N announced they are investing 15MIL into Matrix Semiconductors (memory/carts technology corp) which furthermore shows Big N is expanding or working on the next-gen GBA software medium.
So how does the opposition like M$ counteract big announcements made by Big N?
Easy, just use the damage control ANALyst's report and degrade Big N in the process so mainstreamers fear Big N's stability.
ANALysts reports never ever mention anything about profits (why would they Big N anniahilates M$ profits in the gaming industry) they only mention some obscure bullshit like M$ managed to outsell Big N (but wouldnt dare mention about the profit side of the transaction because its well documented that M$ is losing billions and loses even more everytime it increases its console sales over Big N).
Notice how short term these retard ANALysts are who predominately come from USA and some even UK (*cough* helping out Rare and Xbox platform there *cough*).
Big N clearly stated the day they bow out of home console hardware is the day they discontinue develope handheld consoles and seeing as Big N owns the handheld market youd have to be some delusional ANALyst to believe Big N should become a 3rd Party as the recent report sugested.
The moral of this post is that remember that ANALysts can be used as puppet tools by competitors who cant handle progress/announcements by its competition.
There is a disgraceful conduct of ANALists always from USA (where the Xbox fraternity derives from & sometimes also special guest apperances from U.K ANALists so as to not show USA are total bigots), using a subtle smear campaign of damage control conduct implemented to defame Big N's reputation or breakthroughs in the gaming industry.
Most gamers by now know that the Xbox venture is billion$ of dollars in the red and that ANALysts are payed considerably to not even make a whimper about the logic in the Xbox venture and most gamers are well aware that M$ needs Big N to exit the home console hardware sector in order for M$ to be able to even delusionally believe they can take on Sony.
A trillion dollars cannot help M$, they need Big N to exit so M$ can take on Sony head-on with M$ underpricing incentives.
With 2 competing console produces, M$ can never make any profit on the Xbox venture because it doesnt have a controlling monopoly and to add insult one of the hardware producers (Big N) has a platform listed at a retail price point lower than M$'s underpriced platform against Sony's platform AND Big N is still making huge profits.
Therefore every few months whenever you hear a breakthrough from Nintendo, make note that a damage control defamation report made by ANALists against Big N will be used to defame Big N. That is the nature of desperate conglomorate aggressors that want to eliminate competition and then create another monopoly.
However reality shows that gamers may be gamers but they also know when retard puppets like ANALysts are doing dirty work for those that pay them well enough to do it.
-----
2002 = The Year of the Fund Q & Triforce
Topic: Poll: Do analysts think non-mainstream gamers are retards? (Read 2016 times)
