On the talk of Final Fantasy, this brings up a really interesting point that I'm not sure I have an opinion on...
Square has said publicly that it plans to bring FFXI to any system that can support it next gen. What that boils down to is "any system that can reasonably hold up to 8 gigs of data locally." The X-Box 360 has the announcment because we know it has large hard drive support...
If Sony announces a HD for the PS3, they will get it too.
Now Nintendo has come out and said that they want flas memory to be the storage option for the rev, which is awesome for every game other than MMOs like FFXI...
Do you think it's worth Nintendo making HD option for the system if it means the close to launch release of a big game like FFXI? It's basically like them buying another first gen title (possibly even launch) just by adding a new peripheral.
I for one, am very torn on this subject. I've had terrible issues with the Sony HD, but I've had terrible issues with the Playstation hardware in general...
Would you guys pay 50-70 dollars more for the console just for the opportunity to play games like FFXI?
I don't want to derail the topic with this, but I guess my point is, should Nintendo add a hard drive solely because it could mean more game possibilities and seal the deal on a big name close to launch title? Somehow, I don't really think so, but it is an interesting argument.
As for other launch titles...
1. They need a big name platformer in the mario universe. I wouldn't mind spin-offs like what is being talked about in the DK thread.
2. They need Smash Bros. obviously.
3. Then they need a non system seller first party title that showcases the remote. Pilotwings would be a perfect fit in my opnion.
That's all they should release. They don't want to flood the launch with AAA titles and even if Metroid is ready, they should hold off IMO.
As for third party stuff...
1. Tilt sensing Monkey Ball.. (Sega should be almost done with this now as it just makes too much sense for them to not have started it long ago.)
2. EA Sports titles (as much as I'm sick of them, they need to be there.)
3. A square enhanced port... Yeah i know, you think I'm crazy... but again, in my opinion, if there is a big Square original game, it should be held onto for later... Getting a nice port of one of the numbered FFs to be played one handed would be outstanding though and could set the pace for RPGs on the system... I would personally go with a suped up version of FFIX.
4. Throw in some UbiSoft multiplatform games and you are golden... (PoP, SC, etc.)