All I'm saying is, if the policy is to review each game as its own entity then I think it should contain both detailed information on what's changed as well as on the game(s) themselves. As was pointed out, Mr. Jack didn't write the reviews of the first three games so he might have a different perspective on them than the others, especially since he played them here again years after their original releases.
I was just offering up a suggestion, I didn't mean to step on anyone's toes.