Opening post has been updated with...
>>
http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/forums/index.php?topic=30478.msg581036#msg581036~ Sega ~
HRMMMMMMMMMMM... The least bad of the worst, if that's anything to brag about. Sega tries, yet they don't. Their most successful title(s) are actually Wii Sports derivatives. Huh.
~ Konami ~
Got your bread & butter song & dance titles, plus some footsie ball. Beyond those, Konami wants to be known for Wii Sports knockoffs, intentional kiddeh titles, and TARGET TERRORRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR. The plan was to make more of that stuff in case any of them succeeded, apparently. Typically. Unsurprisingly. As usual. Dammit, 3rd Parties.
This is the family Silent Hill: Shattered Memories was born into?
~ Take Two ~
Way to go, relying on sports license abuse that competes with EA's own. The rest are largely vistors from the PLANET MEH. Do any games seem to be worth working on or nurturing without those Grand Theft Auto-sized budgets? Hmm?
~ Namco-Bandai ~
Despite hitting the ground running with a WAGGLE SPINOFF, it's suprising they haven't done much (nor localized much). They're sorta all over the place without specializing in anything (is Zoo Games the undisputed KING of Wii racing games?). A peculiar kind of lazy.
~ Capcom ~
good port, rail shooter, bad port, old port, old port, rail shooter, old port, stuff stuff stuff... oh my gosh, is Capcom lazier than NAMCO?
~ Square-Enix ~
1. An on-rails spinoff NINTENDO MADE FOR THEM
2. Some other spinoff
3. A DEE-ESS PORT OF A SPINOFF
4. A too-little-too-late spinoff of a SPINOFF
It's obvious that Square-Enix... DOESN'T GIVE A ****.
Salvation...?
~ The Nintendo Wall of Glory ~