Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Goldeneye 2 only for GC?  (Read 3142 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bishman

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
Goldeneye 2 only for GC?
« on: August 23, 2003, 05:32:54 PM »
Logged

Offline Bill Aurion

  • NWR Forum Loli
  • Score: 34
    • View Profile
RE:Goldeneye 2 only for GC?
« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2003, 05:35:40 PM »
This is really old news, or should I say, rumor.  It was also rumored that Free Radical was the developer.  If EA is developing it, I won't give it a second look.
Logged
~Former Resident Zelda Aficionado and Nintendo Fan~

Offline Hemmorrhoid

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE:Goldeneye 2 only for GC?
« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2003, 01:18:03 AM »
If they really make a Goldeneye, they should just take over the gameplay mechanics like 95%, maybe on or two tweaks to use the new controllers, and then just make a new awesome story etc

I just dont get how nobody manages to recreate the glory of Goldeneye, Im not saying improve, but recreate.
Logged
LZ 2005

Offline Rich

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE:Goldeneye 2 only for GC?
« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2003, 09:44:26 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by: Bill
This is really old news, or should I say, rumor.  It was also rumored that Free Radical was the developer.  If EA is developing it, I won't give it a second look.


What? Your not gonna even try it because its made by EA? sorry but I dont get your resoning for that. Agent under fire and Nightfire were awesome, I'll admit that The World is not Enough wasn't that great but they have come a long way with First person shooters. all they would have to do is recreate the experiencefrom Nightfire and put it in a new story that goes along with the Goldeneye theme. Or even use the same story and levels as the 64 game I would care it would still be awesome.
Logged

Offline TooShort

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE:Goldeneye 2 only for GC?
« Reply #4 on: August 24, 2003, 03:18:44 PM »
AUF sucked big time! The controls are terrible!

I never had the chance to play NF but from what I saw the controls looked clunky, and very stiff.

I agree that if EA makes a GE2 than it'll probably suck, but I won't denounce the thing before it even exists.
Logged
"To laugh often and much;
To win the respect of intelligent people and the affection of children;
To earn the appreciation of honest critics and endure the betrayal of false friends;
To appreciate beauty, to find the best in others;
To leave the world a bit better, whether by a healthy c

Offline d_bomb_23

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE: Goldeneye 2 only for GC?
« Reply #5 on: August 24, 2003, 03:36:13 PM »
yea AUF was a terrible game

NF was alrite,it was much much better then AUF

Logged

Offline Perfect Cell

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE: Goldeneye 2 only for GC?
« Reply #6 on: August 24, 2003, 07:51:13 PM »
Goldneye is rumored to be in development, but only for the PS2. It would be good if Nintendo got it ala RE, Nin needs more "adult" Exclusives, and their own FPS. I mean X-box has Halo, PS2 will have Killzone, and we dont have anything
Logged

Offline Termin8Anakin

  • Auuuu =\
  • Score: 2
    • View Profile
RE: Goldeneye 2 only for GC?
« Reply #7 on: August 24, 2003, 08:54:05 PM »
Whatever the case, the developer is either Free Radical or Zoonami.
If you want the FULL Goldeneye experience, make it a no-real-genre type of game.
Third person (everything or nothing), first person (nightfire and goldeneye), stealth (MGS and Splinter Cell), a better tank chase where EVERYTHING is destructable, interactive sex with Natalya, a boss where the goal is to get out of Xenia's legs, and an ending where the objective is to try and make out with Natalya without Wade and the Marines seeing you.

THAT would be the ultimate Goldeneye game.
Or you can just watch the movie, cause it is still Brosnan's best Bond to date.
Logged
Comin at ya with High Level Course Language and Violence

Offline PIAC

  • is actually agentseven
  • Score: 2
    • View Profile
RE: Goldeneye 2 only for GC?
« Reply #8 on: August 24, 2003, 09:26:19 PM »
*intejects* you spelt Sean Conery wrong there termin8, and he wasn't in goldeneye, what are you on?
Logged

Offline Hemmorrhoid

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE:Goldeneye 2 only for GC?
« Reply #9 on: August 25, 2003, 10:36:06 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by: Termin8Anakin
Whatever the case, the developer is either Free Radical or Zoonami.
If you want the FULL Goldeneye experience, make it a no-real-genre type of game.
Third person (everything or nothing), first person (nightfire and goldeneye), stealth (MGS and Splinter Cell), a better tank chase where EVERYTHING is destructable, interactive sex with Natalya, a boss where the goal is to get out of Xenia's legs, and an ending where the objective is to try and make out with Natalya without Wade and the Marines seeing you.

THAT would be the ultimate Goldeneye game.
Or you can just watch the movie, cause it is still Brosnan's best Bond to date.


not only brosnans best one, but one of the best ever

what has happened to james bond, every movie sucks more, progressively since goldeneye

Logged
LZ 2005

Offline vudu

  • You'd probably all be better off if I really were dead.
  • NWR Junior Ranger
  • Score: -19
    • View Profile
RE: Goldeneye 2 only for GC?
« Reply #10 on: August 25, 2003, 11:49:31 AM »
best bond ever?

::smacks hemmorrhoid::
Logged
Why must all things be so bright? Why can things not appear only in hues of brown! I am so serious about this! Dull colors are the future! The next generation! I will never accept a world with such bright colors! It is far too childish! I will rage against your cheery palette with my last breath!

Offline GoldShadow1

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE:Goldeneye 2 only for GC?
« Reply #11 on: August 25, 2003, 04:13:35 PM »
I don't see how this would have any connection with GoldenEye for N64 at all.  There have been tons of Bond games.  It was Rare that made the difference, not the license.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up