Quote
Originally posted by: VideoGamerX
It's like the difference between saying:
The United States are going to war on terrorism.
and,
The United States is going to war on terrorism.
Which do you think is correct? I know which one Microsoft Word says is correct, and I know the one I would use would be viewed as correct on a formal paper. Now, all I want to know is what's up with the usage of 'are' people? Just curious to hear your reasoning and don't mind if you keep doing it.
Well, the United States is viewed as a name. In that case, it's singular, and so 'is.'
However, if you don't view it as a name, but as the united states, then it's plural, thus 'are.'
Taking it even further, geese are flying overhead. However, a flock if geese is flying over head.
In the same way, one could view 'United' as the group term for an amount of states. This would turn it to 'is.'
However, much as french uses 'vous' to formerly reffer to a person respectfully, the old english 'thou' should be put into use when reffering to Nintendo, but only in the second person. When in the presence of Nintendo (whether as seperate buisness people, or a collective) you should therefor reffer to them as Thou and use the form of the verb 'to be' "art". So, when speeking to Shigeru Miyomoto, you would say "Thou art the most enlightened human being I have ever met." In the same way, with other verbs, you would say (for the future tense of 'to be') Thou shalt not forget to make online play accessable for thine next console. Note the use of 'thine' as the second-person possesive.
On the other hand, when speaking to the town foo... erm, I mean, George Bush, you would use what is known as Hill-billy communication. For example: "You yella bellied bu-ffoon! Killin' for peace is like makin' luuv for thems virginity-types!" And soforth.
I hope I have been of use.