Author Topic: Why not a Viewtifull Joe Advance?  (Read 6923 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline AdvancedGamer

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
Why not a Viewtifull Joe Advance?
« on: June 10, 2003, 11:06:43 AM »
Viewtifull Joe advance would be sooooooooo sick. There's no reason not to make one. it would be so perfect. Post replies.  
Video Games-
Why waste good technology on medicine and science?

Now Playing: Zelda: TP (GC)
Mario Kart (DS)
NSMB (DS)

Offline bloodlustandloss

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
Why not a Viewtifull Joe Advance?
« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2003, 09:31:50 PM »
I wouldn't exactly agree with you.  Yes, it is a side scroller, but you have to remember that the game is fully 3-D.  You really couldn't recreate the same type of feel and look on the GBA.  Although if it were possible, it would be an awesome idea.  When I got the preview disc I played Viewtiful Joe like mad.  So if there ever was a true, well made port I would definately go out and buy it.

Offline PIAC

  • is actually agentseven
  • Score: 2
    • View Profile
RE: Why not a Viewtifull Joe Advance?
« Reply #2 on: June 10, 2003, 11:14:29 PM »
i want a new battle toads or double dragon or something so yes i would be interested in a veiwtiful joe advance game

Offline aoi tsuki

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE: Why not a Viewtifull Joe Advance?
« Reply #3 on: June 11, 2003, 08:27:36 AM »
The graphics are 3D, yes, but the gameplay is decidedly 2D. The only thing that might not translate well to the GBA is  the characters. When using zoom or slow-mo, the detail in characters is apparent on the GC version. To recreate that on the GBA, you'd either need several prerendered frames, or cel-shaded characters, which haven't been done on the GBA, especially at that size.

VJ on GBA is a definite possibility though.
"Snake felt a hunger for Meryl blossom within his loins."

Offline controllerport1

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE: Why not a Viewtifull Joe Advance?
« Reply #4 on: June 14, 2003, 03:55:14 AM »
They could always use a vertical scroll setup (a la Super Mario Bros. Deluxe) to allow the player to view things above the visible area of the screen, allowing the characters to take up more screen space. Of course, this would limit it to a degree, and the vertical scroll is hard to get right. Plus a lot of VJ's visual appeal is the movement of the objects(rotating some flat objects) although it's subtle sometimes. This would be fairly hard to do right, but it's a possibility. Let's hope VJ sells well, then mabie we'll get a GBA version. KEEP THOSE FINGERS CROSSED!

stay Viewtiful people.  
shiggfriggantastic!

Offline Blackfire

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE: Why not a Viewtifull Joe Advance?
« Reply #5 on: June 15, 2003, 07:38:36 PM »
Lets get a Metal Slug game on the GBA...oh yeah baby thats one bad ass game.
AKA NintendoKiD

RAWR!!

Brianna Banks I love you.

Offline mouse_clicker

  • Pod 6 is jerks!
  • Score: 3
    • View Profile
Why not a Viewtifull Joe Advance?
« Reply #6 on: June 17, 2003, 01:34:26 PM »
Let me adress the question posed in the title, i.e. Why not a Viewtifull Joe Advance?

The answer is quite simple- because Capcom isn't even sure if the Gamecube version will do well so they certainly don't want to pour money into a handheld sequel without first knowing there's a fanbase.
"You know you're being too serious when Mouse tells you to lighten up... ^_^"<BR>-Bill

Offline Chu Chu Pocket

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
Why not a Viewtifull Joe Advance?
« Reply #7 on: July 17, 2003, 06:15:01 PM »
Graphics and camera movement wouldn't be the only problem with a port of Viewtiful joe. You would have to add in the controls factor, since the GC controller has 6 buttons not to mention the C-stick and D-pad while the GBA only has 4. The controls would have to be dumbed down so much it probably wouldn't play very well.
Who can take the trash out
Stomp it down for you
Take the plastic bag and do the twisty thingy too
The Garbageman!!!

Offline vudu

  • You'd probably all be better off if I really were dead.
  • NWR Junior Ranger
  • Score: -19
    • View Profile
RE: Why not a Viewtifull Joe Advance?
« Reply #8 on: July 18, 2003, 05:07:03 AM »
punch = b
kick = a
jump = up
fast = l
slow = r
zoom = down
Why must all things be so bright? Why can things not appear only in hues of brown! I am so serious about this! Dull colors are the future! The next generation! I will never accept a world with such bright colors! It is far too childish! I will rage against your cheery palette with my last breath!

Offline vudu

  • You'd probably all be better off if I really were dead.
  • NWR Junior Ranger
  • Score: -19
    • View Profile
RE: Why not a Viewtifull Joe Advance?
« Reply #9 on: July 18, 2003, 05:08:06 AM »
actually, now that i think about it, you need to be able to duck.  so zoom = l + r
Why must all things be so bright? Why can things not appear only in hues of brown! I am so serious about this! Dull colors are the future! The next generation! I will never accept a world with such bright colors! It is far too childish! I will rage against your cheery palette with my last breath!

Offline Soundworks

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
Why not a Viewtifull Joe Advance?
« Reply #10 on: July 18, 2003, 11:47:01 AM »
That would be so sweet!

And I'm in need of a new good side scroller. I already have Mario Bros 3 on Snes. And enough with the remakes..  

Offline PIAC

  • is actually agentseven
  • Score: 2
    • View Profile
RE: Why not a Viewtifull Joe Advance?
« Reply #11 on: July 19, 2003, 07:18:17 AM »
well, its a huge hit in japan, so if there was any possibility before, its now a slightly better possibility!

Offline mouse_clicker

  • Pod 6 is jerks!
  • Score: 3
    • View Profile
Why not a Viewtifull Joe Advance?
« Reply #12 on: July 19, 2003, 10:38:35 AM »
I wouldn't say a huge hit quite yet- from what I understand Capcom anticipated Viewtiful Joe selling rather poorly in Japan so they had an inital release of only 50,000 copies, which of course sold out very quickly. I don't know if Capcom has released it's second shipment yet, though, or how well it did/will sell.
"You know you're being too serious when Mouse tells you to lighten up... ^_^"<BR>-Bill

Offline PIAC

  • is actually agentseven
  • Score: 2
    • View Profile
RE: Why not a Viewtifull Joe Advance?
« Reply #13 on: July 19, 2003, 06:15:31 PM »
well a sell out is still a hit, cause then it hypes the game further, supply and demand etc.

well, either way, its selling well

Offline Oldskool

  • Maker of Fine Straitjackets since 1997
  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
Why not a Viewtifull Joe Advance?
« Reply #14 on: July 20, 2003, 12:11:23 AM »
I don't know if the GBA could handle the slo-mo and stuff well.
"I love the smell of napalm in the morning. Smells like victory!"

Proudly using my Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo D laptop.

Offline PIAC

  • is actually agentseven
  • Score: 2
    • View Profile
RE: Why not a Viewtifull Joe Advance?
« Reply #15 on: July 20, 2003, 10:25:10 AM »
yeah it could, just overload the proccessor so it has slowdown

the GBA could easily handle it.. it is a 32bit proccessor after all. play some Golden Sun and see the impressive graphics during the battles, it can be done.. please let it be done :\

Offline mouse_clicker

  • Pod 6 is jerks!
  • Score: 3
    • View Profile
Why not a Viewtifull Joe Advance?
« Reply #16 on: July 20, 2003, 11:23:13 AM »
I guess Viewtiful Joe is a hit in Japan- it was the 4th best selling game and is now the 9th- pretty good.
"You know you're being too serious when Mouse tells you to lighten up... ^_^"<BR>-Bill

Offline dmcollin

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
Why not a Viewtifull Joe Advance?
« Reply #17 on: July 21, 2003, 02:14:39 PM »
Quote

Originally posted by: PIAC
i want a new battle toads or double dragon or something so yes i would be interested in a veiwtiful joe advance game


some company is coming out with an updated version of double dragon and river city ransom for xmas this year

Offline Gohan_Chaos

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
Why not a Viewtifull Joe Advance?
« Reply #18 on: July 22, 2003, 08:13:12 AM »
that would be phat, it would be like Final Fight, except it would have to be a longer game, and as for the powers, I dont know if it would work on the GBA
Jhoan Suriel

Offline Michael8983

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
Why not a Viewtifull Joe Advance?
« Reply #19 on: July 25, 2003, 12:09:40 PM »
From my understanding, VJ and all the Capcom 5 except for RE4 are made by small teams with minimal development costs. So VJ won't have to sell that well to be a huge success for Capcom.
Also, Capcom knows it could be a potential franchise so even if the first game isn't a massive hit, if it sales well enough to make a nice profit and gains a fan-base (already happened!), its sequels could perform exponentially better.


Offline misternull

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE:Why not a Viewtifull Joe Advance?
« Reply #20 on: July 31, 2003, 04:25:43 AM »
who said something about metal slug?

if you're looking for a game to hold you over till someone gets smart and ports metal slug, then check out ct special forces 2.  it's pretty good, and has a lot of same gameplay elements.

ct special forces: back to hell
even a broken clock is right atleast two times a day.
http://www.spunge.org/~mrnull