In other words, I mean to say the dissenters are true fanboys of Nintendo because they want whats best for the company and aren't afraid to speak up, instead of just being sheep and blindly accepting whatever they are told.
Chozo, no disrespect, but this is total ****. I have no doubt that you
want what's best for Nintendo and have thoughts on how to get there. I just don't understand why what you're suggesting
is what's best for Nintendo because you can't prove anything. There's an immensely large gap between what you want and what is.
I'm having a tremendous amount of trouble wrapping my head around your assertion that the dissenters somehow know what's up and everyone else are just sheep or rubes or whatever. Why can't people just like these things? Why are they blind followers? Why does their opinion matter less? Because that's what you're basically saying here. By your own logic, anyone who is a dissenter is the true fan who knows what's best. Replace "Wii" with anything else Nintendo released that was popular.
Some people just like things. In this case, a lot of people like this thing you don't particularly like. Maybe this is the best way, maybe not. Disliking something doesn't validate that something as bad. I didn't like Skyward Sword. I don't think Nintendo should never make a game like it again because I didn't like it. That would be a pretty audacious claim. "You can't have something you like because I don't like it and I know better than you." I reckon someone would flat-out fucking backhand me for making that claim.
Now, I'm not saying that you're wrong; I simply don't see how you could conceivably prove that you're right. And I don't understand how, at this point, some of you on this message board cannot grasp the nature of subjectivity. Additionally, I'm not saying that you shouldn't voice your concerns. Let your voice be heard! However, the second you start claiming that what you're saying is fact, I raise an eyebrow and say, "Let me tell you why that's bullshit."
/rant