Ever since we started to discuss the validity of Go Nintendo over at the Wii forums I felt as if I was playing a real life game of Phoenix Wright here.
Both parties have sincere sounded testimonies, but only one is relevant towards solving the case.
COURT IS IN SESSION!
Judge Pap here! Let's present the parties!
The NWR users will be the jury.
The thread where the debacle started.Party 1Name: Deguello and NWR community
Occupation: NWR member, reviewer
Story: Claims that he was treated unjustly after he went to the chat room to complain about the site posting his reviews without notifying him.
Witness: Pro 666
Claims that the website gets easy perks despite it being a blog that chronicles other websites. A Oprah like site in other words.
Party 2Name: The Go Nintendo staff
Occupation: Nintendo blog
Story: RMC claims that he never knew of the story because Deguello never contacted him about it. Says that he feels bad about it. The site is also accused of getting easy press perks, no original content, RMC insulting its readers and never shaving or bathing.
Witness: The Go Nintendo staff
*They couldn't be contacted
So, who is the guilty party here? Is Deguello playing the victim card, or is Go Nintendo neglecting basic courtesy laws?
DISCUSS!
NOTE: Deguello and the NWR staff, if you feel that the issue is too serious to be made fun of feel free to discuss.
But considering the NWR users have run away with more serious stuff in the past this shouldn't be a problem.