Sorry if I got anyone's hopes up, but there's a reason why we don't post "come back to see something" type articles at PGC. I just thought that it would be interesting enough to warrant a forum thread, and as it stands, it was just barely interesting enough for that.
What I can't understand is why the news was under embargo to begin with. Xbox 360 is already out, and Sony has their head shoved so far up their collective keister that they wouldn't be able to capitalize on the knowledge anyway. "Three weeks ago, we started shipping chips." Bravo ... anyone with any business knowledge whatsoever would have assumed that to launch in October/November, you'd have to start shipping chips ... oh, about THREE WEEKS AGO.
Quote
Originally posted by: Artimus
Quote
Originally posted by: RickPowers
Quote
Originally posted by: Artimus
Rick, it does qualify as journalism. Not the strict pure-facts news reporting denotation, but certainly a couple other. Check a dictionary. Entertainment Journalism is the term I'd use, personally.
I could care less what a dictionary says. If you're just regurgitating information fed to you by someone who's interest lies in using you as a publicity method, then it is most definitely NOT "journalism". I'm not even saying that we need hardcore investigative journalism, but any monkey with a keyboard can repost a press release. Which is all this "news" is going to amount to.
Ok, so you don't consider PGC to be a journalist site either?
No, I most certainly do not. I've done very few "journalistic" pieces in my career,
like this trip to Nintendo's North Bend production facility, and I've been very vocal about the lack of journalism in the games industry. The need for secrecy with many companies is certainly a major factor, but the fact is, we're used as an arm of corporate marketing. It's just the way it is. Honest reviews are not journalism. Covering trade shows is not journalism. We're writers, but quite frankly, I'm fine with that.