As for people complaining about the staff's involvement in this debate, well, I think that's our job. You know, I'm not interested in rubber stamping and defending every single thing Nintendo does. I'm also not interested in attacking every decision they make. Some of their past decisions which I disagreed with have turned out to be quite smart; others have not. I don't know which way this naming issue will go. I hope it works out for them, since they seem adamant in keeping it, but that doesn't mean I should start chanting "Live with it, live with it, live with it." (Apparently that's what Perrin has resorted to.) It's an interesting topic that can be analyzed in many ways, and that's exactly what we're doing. And if you want to take a side and argue it, do so with as much intelligence and deliberation as you can muster, and refrain from personal insults. This is like debate team. Argue the issue and not the opponent. If you're tired of the argument, why are you posting in threads like this one? Obviously there are people who still want to discuss it, and I think there will be for a long time. And while E3 should be all about the games, it never is. (See: booth babes, swag, parties, celebrities, contests, live bands, etc.) People at E3 are always talking about all sorts of things, and I can promise you that this Wii name will be one of the biggest topics of all. It is so unusual that for some people, gamers and non-gamers alike, it will seem more important than the system and games themselves. That's not how it should be, but it is a situation of Nintendo's making, and they will have to deal with the consequences and attempt to direct the controversy in their favor.