Quote
Originally posted by: Ian Sane
He's a loser because he's hitting on some chick but another more manly guy comes and steals her away.
I was actually thinking the guy was just coming up to the other cooler guy, ignoring the girls the cooler guy was already with. But whatever.
I'll agree with people that don't see Sony or Microsoft trying to paint people who play as actually being attracted to members of the same sex. More likely that they'd try to paint the system as 'ga
y' in the mornic derogatory term sense of the word. Show cute and colorful games side-by-side with badass games or whatever. Of course, they could still have done that even with 'Revolution' as the title.
Really, I'm not expecting much negative advertising directly related to the 'Wii' name. Maybe a stupid side comment on Xbox.com about how Nintendo fans would rather play with their wiis instead of other people or something.
Quote
Originally posted by: The Omen
Exactly. There's no need to know a revolution is needed. You think when Rage Against the Machine named their band, they were worried people would think they were talking about raging against Zerox copiers? I mean, come on....
I don't think the issue is that some people won't understand what Revolution means (well, some people have brought up that possibility, but let's put that aside a moment.) The issue is: who does the name speak to? If you aren't a hardcore gamer, you don't know that gaming needs a revolution. The name wouldn't speak to non-gamers.
Also, Revolution is just a horribly generic name. Try looking it up on Google. And also, the describes what the system is supposed to do in the marketplace, instead of what it actually does.
...But then, Wii doesn't really describe what the system does, either. It describes the system's 'inclusive' nature. Hmm. Perhaps Nintendo Go wouldn't have been such a bad name after all?