Yea , I question the controls verdict as well - it should be based on potential so early in the race. I also wonder about the screens - they say that the PSPs screen is a bit better than the screens of the DS, but there's TWO screens on the DS - not to mention a touchscreen on the bottom. I'd have thought that the DS would win this section for sure - I guess that if it had, the DS would have won 4-2, and IGN doesn't want that to happen for obvious reasons.
"Unfortunately good ol' Matt from IGN the very same day decided to go on a long tangent about the PSP in the GAMECUBE mailbag again and for no good reason"
I know..that bastard. I mean, seriously, all that in the GAMECUBE mailbag? What the hell is he trying to do - spread his propaganda to people who don't care? Those are exactly the type of things that cause me to lose respect for editors. Funny thing, though. At the end of his mailbag, someone wrote this question:
"Hey Matt,
I was just wondering if you have, or know any editor that has, ever written a letter yourself and published it in the mailbag. I suppose one could do this if they really wanted to say something that couldn't be put in the "News" section, and no one wrote to them about it. It could also occur if the mailbag is experiencing slow times, and the editor needs letters.
I know that this is dishonest, but it could be a distinct possibility for editors.
PS: You know, because you always get the last word when replying to and posting messages, you can afford to be sarcastic and acerbic. However, it isn't exactly what you would call enjoyable for the writer. I must admit, though, it would be a great stress-reliever
"
Oh, the irony. He couldn't find a letter that asked him "Are you so madly in love with your PSP that you would trade your wife for it?" so he decided to give his opinion by getting off topic from another question. BTW, I totally agree with the PS that the person wrote