We store cookies, you can get more info from our privacy policy.
GC

North America

GameCube Component Video Cable

by Justin Nation - October 15, 2001, 10:04 am EDT

9.5

For those with big screen digital televisions out there you won't want to be without one. For everyone else, don't read further.

It really is somewhat difficult to write up a real review for a piece of equipment like this one since the answer is somewhat black and white with only minor shades of gray. If you have a big screen digital TV you'll likely already appreciate the necessity of the proper cables to maximize the appearance of images on your investment. If you don't have a television like this you wouldn't really have a reason to buy this cable and you probably wouldn't even have inputs for it.

Anyway, now with that out of the way lets get on to the specifics. One very important thing to remember with this cable is that it will ONLY provide you with video, you will actually still need a plain old Nintendo AV cable (the same one they've been using for a while now) to get your stereo sound outputs (hopefully for your surround sound receiver). It was because of this way of hooking things up that I was so easily able to contrast the look of the plain cable with the component one since I could switch back and forth between them.

First and foremost in terms of picture quality the difference is predictably quite noticeable even to eyes that aren't picky. The standard AV cable's video display had a pretty consistent flicker visible, the colors were much more muted, and there was more of a blur to everything on-screen. With the component cable the video quality was very high, the colors seemed to jump from the screen, and for the most part even the interlaced display looked excellent.

This brings us to about the only other major point, the progressive scan quality. All that can be said is that there is some difference, most predictably with the letters looking a bit cleaner. Surprisingly though, with the exception of an odd detail here or there it was hard to discern many other visual differences between interlaced and progressive.

In the end, as noted, this review is much more of a quick summary than something full-blown since people with high end equipment won't hesitate to pick up the best cables they can find. That said, take some reassurance that from a comparison with standard AV cable there is a very noticeable difference and your money will be well-spent.

Score

Appearance Comfort Quality Value Construction Final
0 0 10 9 10 9.5
Appearance
0

N/A

Comfort
0

N/A

Quality
10

The difference between these cables and the standard AV cable is night and day, as it should be. If you've made the investment in a high quality television you'd be a fool to degrade your experience over the $50 or so the cable costs.

Value
9

While I can't comment on the total audio/videophile fanatic quality of the cables (I have the Japanese cables and can't read the specs) I can say that they seem to be well-insulated, are of a convenient length, and don't seem to be of any worse quality than standard Monster cables.

Construction
10

The colors, crispness, and total experience are well worth the extra cost for admission

Final
9.5

Because of the drastic difference with and without the cables it is impossible to ignore what a terrific investment these cables are if you have the right equipment. It is possible someone like Monster could make more fanatic-level cables for that extra iota of quality but these are great and considering the cost of Monster component cables the price is reasonable.

Summary

Pros
  • A very clean and flicker-free display
  • Makes 480p display possible
  • Makes for very crisp and vibrant colors
Cons
  • None that are applicable
Review Page 2: Conclusion

Share + Bookmark





Genre
Developer Nintendo

Worldwide Releases

na: GameCube Component Video Cable
Release Nov 18, 2001
Got a news tip? Send it in!
Advertisement
Advertisement