Quote
Which game is better Fire Emblem or Final Fantasy Tactics, please explain pros and cons for each game, thanks
~ Final Fantasy Tactics Advance ~
Pros:
~ Cool Isometric graphics.
~ Lots of non-linear missions.
~ Comfortably fast battling (just a quick note: this was my only gripe with Tactics Ogre, it was too slow)
~ Quite a few classes
Cons:
~ Story is trite and contrived.
~ Battles are extremely easy. Didn't die once.
~ Judge system is aggrivating, and totally gimmicky.
~ Many classes have re-hashed abilities. And most of the unique abilities are down-right useless.
This was probably my most disappointing game of the year. It felt incomplete. The story was bad, and the gameplay required little streategy. All in all it was a good game, but didn't stack up against its competition (or its predecessor).
~ Fire Emblem ~
Pros:
~ Great Story
~ Awesome classes.
~ Outstanding Battle Animations
~ Character support system that furthers character relationships. Really makes all the characters memorable. (Not to mention you get stat boosts when near supporting chars)
~ Battling is as fast or slow as you like.
~ Gameplay is challenging and requires much more fore-thought than FFTA
~ Character promotion is really satisfying (even though a character can only be promoted once)
Cons:
~ Map graphics are a bit flat.
~ Limited inventory space can be inconvenient (if you forget to make room before battles)
~ Weapons break. This isn't that bad but I was always hording the expensive weapons

(of course I finished the game with a mess of unspent money... Doh!)
~ Difficult to level up healer classes.
I really love this game, the story is great, the character development is top-notch, and the battles are great fun. I plan on playing it again very soon. I'm also hoping that the older games make it to the US in some form, and I'm REALLY hoping we see a Fire Emblem on GC.