Guys, it's because Nintendo is going to be rounding up ALL the remaining 3rd party support and housing it in their Nintendo booth at E3. Nintendo wanted to make the biggest impact possible by housing everything you can do on a Nintendo system in the Nintendo booth.
It's a bold move, but Nintendo can pull it off. Best E3 Yet. guaranteed. [/blindfaith/shininglightatendoftunnel]
I actually could see all the remaning third party support being shown at Nintendo's booth... because there's so little of it.
So replacing the Wii U will supposedly damange consumer trust. And getting to the point where Nintendo is the only Wii U developer won't do that? Nintendo already has a bad reputation for having terrible third party support so do we let it get worse? How do they ever bounce back if at some point the Wii U release schedule does become literally four or five games a year or major retailers stop carrying it because it has too few games? Or is just over for Nintendo on consoles?
Personally I'm less likely to buy any future Nintendo consoles if the Wii U limps around with jack **** support for five years. By then Nintendo will have a "oh are they still here?" reputation and I'll assume that their next console won't sell and won't have any support and thus isn't a worthwhile investment. If they replace it sooner they stand some chance to salvage some relevency and not let the world forget about them while Sony and MS build up their userbase.
Nintendo ditched the Virtual Boy when it flopped. IBM dropped the PC Jr. and it didn't hurt the reputation of their main PC products. Dud products get canned. It happens and isn't always a death sentence. Remember that Sega was in poor financial shape when they released the Dreamcast while Nintendo is not (yet).