People crack me up about the online thing.
You do realize it costs a few million just to set up a usable network, and then several million to keep it going? That's not including employees to train and watch over it, software development, programming, tech support, and any other thousand things that go into online gaming.
Sony might have a good online presence, but they are losing millions every year on it. 300K users isn't going to cut it, unless they charged 20 bucks a month. Same thing with Xbox. Their userbases seem high because they are the first consoles to go out on a limb online. But I gaurantee you they are losing an insane amount of money on the deal.
Oh, and you highlight SOCOM as a good title? Yea, beacuse we haven't had enough war themed FPS games around that you can play online lately. Oh, and there certainly isn't voice support for them. And they CERTAINLY don't focus on team-based tactics.
No, I've never heard of such a novel idea before in my LIFE! Golly! Sony sure is smart! They didn't rip off 21093821093 games before them at all! They came up with a totally new and original idea! WOW!
As far as arguing Nintendo's online capabilities, Animal Crossing, F Zero, Mario Kart, Smash Bros, and Soul Calibur would probably cause me to die of happiness instantly. You're whining about lag in Smash Bros when it doesn't even exist yet? Smart argument. "Kid" indeed.
There was talk of Zelda online for a while, and I dunno how that would pan out but it would certainly be interesting. The new Zelda games would be perfect for this, but I wouldn't mind seeing a full on MMORPG. Same with other titles - what would stop them from using GBA games in the online? Advance Wars online perhaps?
I'm hearing a lot of fluff and not a lot of logic from some parts of this thread.
-Strell