Damn, I was busy today and I missed - I probably won't be home tomorrow as well, so can you do me a favour Pryo? Can I vote now for tomorrow? Here's my reasoning..
Excerpts from Mafia: Day 1
Crash: For lack of any knowledge what so ever
Vote Zach
Zach: grr... D@mn the lateness of my name alphabetically. Vote Crash for being uninformed and simply voting for the last person on the list.
Crash: haha zach you got me nothing personal... just easy to copy and paste the last name
(...)
well, if anyone could tell me how to vote better on day 1 please let me know, but from what i can tell its all random.
-----
Suspicious, eh? It is my belief that Crash feigned naivete, and is actually part of the mafia with Zach. Using the guise of an innocent first-time player, they probably decided that he should vote for Zach, saying that his reason was that Zach was the last on the list alphabetically. The intent would be to make it seem like they are not related, and also paint a picture of Crash being an innocent bystander. Note the quote "for lack of any knowledge whatsoever"..
But what really makes me believe in this is Zach's response. How on earth would you be able to guess that someone voted for you since your name was last on the alphabetical list? And he made it seem like it was a fact that Crash was uninformed, saying, "Vote Crash for being uninformed and simply voting for the last person on the list." How would he know that Crash did that, and be able to say it like it was the definitive truth? Unless Crash had explicitly stated that he voted for Zach because [Zach] was the last name on the list, I would never have inferred what Zach did. That wouldn't have even crossed my mind if I were Zach.
Crash responded by saying that Zach got him, and it was easy to copy/paste the last name. But why would you copy the last name, and not the first?
This is by no means damning evidence, but by reading between the lines you will be able to infer what I did. There are just too many plotholes, and it seems forced. So..
VOTE CRASH!