Author Topic: Why change......?  (Read 1756 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bmfrosty

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
Why change......?
« on: September 21, 2003, 10:57:16 PM »
It occurs to me the the current revisions of nintendo hardware are very very scalable.  

There seems to be little real reason to do more than scale up the processors (cpu video and audio) to higher clock speeds, add more memory, enable higher resolutions for the sake of HDTV comaptibility, and make tweaks to the controls to make the gamecube viable for the next generation.  

Bring the gameboy's res to 360x240 (same aspect ratio as the gba), variable processor multiplier(keep it slow for most titles, ramp it up for 3D support), more memory, OLED screen, two more face buttons, same clamshell style as the SP, and you have a system for the new generation that not only supports the sprites and colors of the snes and nes, but also the screen resolutions.

Result.   Both systems are very easily backwards compatible with the current generation, and support very generous porting (or even emulation) of the earlier generations.

Only real additions that I'd make would be to change the serial ports on the home console to USB 2.0 and make wireless controllers not standard, but clip on.  Instead of plugging in a reciever to the controller port, plug in an antenna, and make the controller either accept a wire, or a battery pack and transmitter (cradled)

As for N5 launch titles, not only the staple of sequels, but also ports from the N64.  Go to ign64, and look at their old reviews.  There are at least 20 games worth porting.  A studio could either be put together for this job, or an outside studio hired.  If the source is available, all they would need to do is some small port work, and an upgrade to models and textures.

-bmfrosty (who really likes the write up and renders for the nexus)

Offline BigJim

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE:Why change......?
« Reply #1 on: September 22, 2003, 09:04:15 PM »
The other benefit to upgrading architecture is reduced R&D (often drastically) and shorter time to market.

I agree in theory about beefing up the current architecture, it has its benefits, though with so many various partners you have to make sure they're all on board again, which it doesn't look like they are. ATI is going Xbox, IBM is going PS3... and those were the main technological contributors to GCN.
"wow."

Offline KDR_11k

  • boring person
  • Score: 28
    • View Profile
RE: Why change......?
« Reply #2 on: September 23, 2003, 11:00:03 AM »
Chip makers are usually able to supply multiple clients , so I wouldn't worry about losing IBM and ATI to the competition. Also, like I said before, I've heard rumors of talks between Nintendo and Cray in addition to IBM...

Offline BigJim

  • Score: 0
    • View Profile
RE:Why change......?
« Reply #3 on: September 24, 2003, 12:51:13 PM »
Well it's already been said that ATI and Nintendo parted ways, and not much later after that the ATI/Xbox thing was announced.

As for IBM, it remains to be seen, but I won't hold my breath there.
"wow."