Topic: Jack Thompson: TOO HOT FOR TV

[Crimm]

I like my litigation with a side of man on man porn.  

[S-U-P-E-R]

Ahahah, I thought it was going to be completely relevant to the case, but it wasn't, maybe only vaguely:

Quote
To the extent that the other attorney’s alleged conduct is in any way relevant… there was no need for Mr. Thompson to file these graphic images in the public record. A simple reference to the website and its alleged links would have sufficed…

lol.

[HadesGigas]

I hope he had his kid buy the gayporn like he did with the M-rated games at Best Buy.

[KDR_11k]

"Goatse is NOT evidence!"

[nitsu niflheim]

It was probably his personal collection and he accidentally submitted it with his brief.

[Crimm]

I like that he did it to shame one of his perceived opponents, who he accuses of "making adult images available to children."  By putting it in a court brief it was made available to everyone as part of public record.

Haha, idiot.

[Djunknown]

Quote
I’m not the one in trouble. The judge found a certain lawyer’s material obscene. I absolutely love it. This is the best thing to happen to me in a long, long time. Check my [case] filings, sweetie.

Can someone call the looney bin now?