Author Topic: Sonic Boom Is the Worst-Performing Sonic Launch Ever  (Read 9852 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.



Offline Luigi Dude

  • Truth Bomber
  • Score: 3
    • View Profile
Re: Sonic Boom Is the Worst-Performing Sonic Launch Ever
« Reply #25 on: February 13, 2015, 11:20:31 PM »
In theory giving Sonic to Mario would work but Sonic in his prime was the alternative to Mario.  The fast-paced platforming of the Genesis games was a different take on the Mario formula and Nintendo might not understand its appeal.  Sonic was effectively rebelling against Mario.  Nintendo would probably make a good game but maybe not a good Sonic game if you get my meaning.

There were a lot of Sonic rip-offs in the 16 bit years and most were not very good but Rocket Knight Adventures was decent.  That was Konami.  Don't know what the people involved would be working on but maybe they could try.  Treasure might be able to do Sonic well.  Whatever team at Namco did Klonoa might be capable.  If we want to try to get Nintendo involved maybe GameFreak is the one to do it since they did Pulseman.

Good Feel showed they could pull it off.


The speed sections in Wario Land Shake are better then anything Sega's made with Sonic in the last 20 years.
I’m gonna have you play every inch of this game! - Masahiro Sakurai

Offline NWR_insanolord

  • Rocket Fuel Malt Liquor....DAMN!
  • NWR Staff Pro
  • Score: -18986
    • View Profile
Re: Sonic Boom Is the Worst-Performing Sonic Launch Ever
« Reply #26 on: February 13, 2015, 11:40:41 PM »
The speed sections in Wario Land Shake are better then anything Sega's made with Sonic in the last 20 years.

That's somewhat inaccurate. Those were better than anything Sega's made with Sonic ever.
Insanolord is a terrible moderator.

J.P. Corbran
NWR Community Manager and Soccer Correspondent