1
Nintendo Gaming / RE:USB Enabled Memory Card!
« on: October 06, 2003, 09:55:09 AM »
Can you make copies of data that you could not ordinarily copy on the cube, i.e. phantasy star, fzero?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
2
Nintendo Gaming / F-Zero music
« on: September 15, 2003, 02:45:48 PM »
I heard that the classic music tracks could be unlocked in F-zero. Is this true? If so how? I would really like to hear classic big blue music!!!
3
Nintendo Gaming / Prime vs. Windwaker
« on: April 28, 2003, 05:06:48 AM »Quote
Originally posted by: "Sky"
You said that Zelda would be better if it took some lessons in terms of length and difficulty, that I never argued with. Now you have also done it again... "and graphics". You also said "would". So there. I have the exact quote in my thread, my specific argument, as well as the argument of many others, is on your statement that Zelda would somehow be magically better if it had graphics that weren't cel-shaded, which is the conclusion that is drawn by multiple forum members to your posts in this thread, some with even earlier claims than me. You state that it's opinion, but at the same time what I mentioned earlier contradicts that.
"Would" it be better if it was a longer and more difficult? That would certainly be nice and I would surely welcome it in the next Zelda. But the claim on graphics is the key to the reason behind the controversy in this thread.
The graphics style you prefer is not the graphics style that "would" make it better. I hope you understand now.
In order to ensure clarity:
"Not just graphics"- But how will a change in graphics style make the game better if the other two elements stay the same? Take this for example, say the next Zelda is more difficult and longer than The Wind Waker, but stays with the same cel-shaded style. It'll be better right? Based on your previous posts I'm sure you'll be inclined to agree. Now take the same game and change it to non cel-shaded style. Is it more preferable to you? I suppose so based on your previous posts. But does that suddenly make it better? Nope. It "would" not make it better no matter what you "think".
I'm not talking about WW though, of course just changing the graphics in WW would probably have a negative effect on WW, because that is the way it was made to be. I THINK that the next zelda would be cooler ir it was not cell shaded, they would have to change the gameplay as well though to make it fit. Of course just changing the graphics may or may not make it better. And you have no idea if the next zelda would be better or worse, so don't say that you know. Perhaps I have been unclear but the point of this post was playing prime after WW was a nice experience because of its realistic appearance (wouldn't it be cool if the next zelda could look like this) I am not talking about WW looking like prime. You can't tell me my opinion would be wrong (which it could be), but I could also be right and we have no way of knowing that until the next one is released (if they change the style). How can you tell me my opinion is wrong? If I liked the style of OOT better, that is my opinion.
4
Nintendo Gaming / Prime vs. Windwaker
« on: April 27, 2003, 09:03:47 PM »
I suppose you a right at some points, Sky, but if you practiced some of what you preached and did not put words into my mouth then you would see what I am getting at. I said zelda would be better if it took some lessons from prime in terms of lenth, difficutly, and graphics. Not just graphics (which of course is opinion). How does my statement make you think that a realistic zelda would be flawless? It probably wouldn't.
5
Nintendo Gaming / Prime vs. Windwaker
« on: April 27, 2003, 08:48:04 PM »Quote
Originally posted by: "Sky"
I don't believe I am required to state the reason, for others have already stated the same exact thing going in on my mind and if you don't see the flaw in your post then me stating my reason would be futile anyway. Apparently others can see the reasoning behind my post, why can't you?
What you fail to realize is this thread topic is based on opinion, there is no right or wrong answer. Since there have been differing viewpioints posted I must assume that you have either no opinion or you like WW graphics (since you wont tell me your opinion it must be a secret or something). If you do that is fine, but I would like to see a realistic zelda in the future (with graphics as well as gameplay). If you dont want that that is your opinion.
6
Nintendo Gaming / Prime vs. Windwaker
« on: April 27, 2003, 07:49:28 PM »Quote
Originally posted by: "Sky"
Yes, I did see your comment that Zelda was a great game. You just happened to miss the reason why what I quoted from you doesn't necessarily sound intelligent.
Well since you gave no reason why you quoted me, your reasons are exactly full of brillance either.
7
Nintendo Gaming / Prime vs. Windwaker
« on: April 27, 2003, 07:26:34 PM »
Grey ninja, if nobody criticized anything then it would never improve.
8
Nintendo Gaming / Prime vs. Windwaker
« on: April 27, 2003, 06:24:31 PM »Quote
Originally posted by: "Sky"Quote
Well... at least I'll remember your name so that I won't hold your posts high regard in the future
Perhaps you did not see that my my comment on how I thought that zelda was a great game. I just thought it could learn some lessons from prime (difficulty, length, and yes graphics). I did not realize that I would get flamed for having an opinion. Its cell shaded graphics were nice this time around, but I hope they at least try one that is not shaded so they can be compared.
9
Nintendo Gaming / Prime vs. Windwaker
« on: April 27, 2003, 06:14:12 PM »
I just think the next zelda game would be better if it was not cell shaded (and I am hoping that this would be the case).
10
Nintendo Gaming / Prime vs. Windwaker
« on: April 27, 2003, 06:03:51 PM »Quote
Originally posted by: Scyth3r
I just have to go around and collect the rest of the artifacts now, but YAWN. Theres not story that keeps me hooked to keep playing.
I suppose I'll attempt to finish it up when Im done w/ Windwaker but its just so boring IMO.
WW has its share treasure hunting.
11
Nintendo Gaming / Prime vs. Windwaker
« on: April 27, 2003, 05:57:45 PM »
What I was getting at was I think that zelda in general (not WW per se) would be even better if it looked realistic. Your right graphics do not make the game, but they are an important part. I thought windwaker was good game regardless of what it looked like.
12
Nintendo Gaming / Prime vs. Windwaker
« on: April 27, 2003, 05:48:29 PM »
I just beat windwaker this week, with lack of a new game to play, I decided that I would play through metroid prime on hard mode. Once again the graphics blew me away. I think that prime is a way better game, including the graphics. Don't get me wrong, windwaker is a great game besides the fact that it is too short and easy. It just made me wonder, what if zelda looked realistic like prime does. What do you guys think?
Sorry if this has already been addressed.
Sorry if this has already been addressed.
Pages: [1]
The entire contents of this Web site, unless otherwise noted, are Copyright © 1999 - 2012 NINWR, LLC. All Rights Reserved. ™ and © for all products, characters, and indicia related thereto which are contained herein are owned by the companies who market or license those products. This Web site is not endorsed, sponsored, nor otherwise affiliated with Nintendo. It has been created for the sole purpose of entertainment and knowledge. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form without consent from NINWR, LLC is prohibited.
