in graphics.
When the GameCube was first released, everybody assumed that in terms of graphical power, the GameCube was 2nd on the list, XboX being 1st and PS2 coming in at 3rd. Slowly but surely everyone started to belive this without question. Well I'm here to question this as fact or fiction? Yes I think we all can agree that all 3 systems can put out some very stunning graphics but is it a fact that the way they are ranked is correct? In terms of specs, yes the XboX has better specs than either system. But specs are just numbers and fractions(and who in thier right ming likes fractions). Lets look at what is "generally" consider the top 4 games for each system.
3 released titles, 1 future release
XBOX
Halo
Dead or Alive: XBV
Splinter Cell
--Ninja Gaiden--
GameCube
Starwars Rouge Squadron
Metriod Prime
Star Fox Adventures
--Zelda: The Wind Waker--
PS2
Metal Gear Soild2: Sons of Liberty
Rachect & Clank
Virtua Fighter 4
--Final FantasyX2--
All these games look great, but when it comes down to pure graphic force, I belive the best looking game in it's highest form(I own all 3 systems with high end hookup's and a HDTV) is STAR FOX ADVENTURS!! I'm not trying to be bias (and forgive me if I forgot a game for for list) but the way I see it GameCube is a superior system in terms of graphics, RIGHT NOW!* I'll be the first to tell you that Ninja Gaiden for the XboX is a sight to behold indeed. And you better belive the PS2 has one or two more tricks up it's sleeve, but if it goes the way I see it, Nintendo's No# 1!*
*I'll belive DOOM3 ont the XBOX when I see it!
Flame on, Jonny Storm!