I don't understand why people are so fown on this game. It looks wacky and kickass.
I agree on the wacky. Some of the ridiculous antics do look kick ass.
Personally, I'm down on this game because there I've seen and read a number of things that could be signs of the game being all sorts of wrong.
1. Itagaki's last release was Ninja Gaiden 2, if I recall correctly. That game was released in 2008. That's a long time to go without a game under your belt. Now it's totally possible he has been observing and researching on the trajectory of games over the time, but who knows.
2. The game is trying to blend first-person aim-down-sights shooting, third-person over-the-shoulder shooting, and stylish melee combat in to one smooth action. Game makers have trouble doing one of those things right, let alone all three at once. We only have video footage to go on, not hands-on experience, but the video footage of Devil's Third's attempt to combine these three aspects look jarring. It is a hell of a feat to attempt, so I hope the game plays better than I think it does.
3. From last year's Polygon interview, I got the impression that the game will be largely made up of the input from the THQ days of the game's development. This is to be expected as I doubt Nintendo would want to spend too much money on this acquisition. Anyway, the THQ influence may have pulled the game in to ill directions. Then again, maybe Itagaki had some bad ideas go through.
Reflecting on the above, I can see how I may be grasping at straws here. Devil's Third is such a curious thing to see Nintendo pick up. By all rights, this game should have faded away when THQ blew up. But here it is as a Nintendo exclusive. This game shouldn't be alive; that it is has me rooting for it a little bit. Seeing the history it has to overcome has me worried for how it will turn out.