I apologize for any misunderstanding if I didn’t elucidate enough in my initial post. When I said “most advanced processor IBM can muster”, I meant within a reasonable price range, not the most advanced processor IBM can create within the technological ability of 2012 (not that you were implying that either). I understand IBM’s business extends far beyond any bone Nintendo throws their way; but it’s not like their partnership hasn’t been a cash cow for them either so “biting the bullet” may have been poor syntax on my part. I just think it would behoove both companies not to skip on power even if it means decreasing the profit margin. What we know is the PS3, 360, and 3DS are/were being sold at a loss because they can boost profits through games sales due to console saturation, and we all know 1st/2nd party is Nintendo’s forte. And as much as I enjoyed your automobile analogy, it’s not entirely apt. Comparing a highly specialized luxury sports car that appeals to a very select group, to a product that is meant to appeal to the mass market is almost impossible. What I mean is, it doesn’t cost Lamborghini $290,000 to produce a $300,000 car; they’re probably selling it at a 200% markup because of its exclusivity. Also, the refresh cycle and depreciation value for a CPU is much different than an inherent collectors’ item, which is essentially the crux of my statement: both companies will definitely make a profit from this endeavor over the long term, so why go cheap? Finally, I just want to thank you for being so dedicated to the Wii U rumor forum, exceptional work.
Topic: Wii U Rumor Round-Up (Read 13024 times)
