Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Grey Ninja

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 145
51
General Chat / RE: G-mail
« on: June 21, 2004, 04:13:50 PM »
Tell them to use their ISP, University, or Yahoo accounts instead.    I don't know for sure that Hotmail is blocked or not... I haven't tested it yet myself.  But I just kinda got ahold of a gmail account myself.  (Thank you kind sir), and I am getting to work on mass mailing like... 3 or 4 people.   I'll tell ya how it goes.  

52
General Chat / RE: G-mail
« on: June 21, 2004, 03:45:19 PM »
Hotmail has blocked gmail... but yahoo just sends all gmail to the bulk folder.  

53
General Chat / RE: G-mail
« on: June 21, 2004, 03:07:16 PM »
California also banned gmail Berny.  

I just find it incredible that so many places are banning gmail when it's not even out yet.  Especially when google doesn't really even do anything that other email dudes don't do.

54
General Chat / RE:Firefox 0.9 released
« on: June 21, 2004, 03:05:40 PM »
Quote

Originally posted by: Berny
WOO! I just discovered Camino! It is TEH FASTZORZ! It has popupblocker and tabbed browsing and everything! (ie: The Works) Wow, I wish I'd known about this before.

EDIT: Added bonus: I was able to import my bookmarks! <3 Camino



Heh.  I was going to recommend that one to someone the other day, as I hear lots of nice things about it.  But given that I am not a Mac user, and completely unfamiliar with it, I just went with the good old "get Firefox" idea.  

Thanks for the vote of confidence in it.

(for those who don't know, Camino is the old school Mac OS variant of Mozilla.)

55
General Chat / RE:Drops of water...
« on: June 20, 2004, 07:23:34 PM »
Quote

Originally posted by: Shifty
Owww, I can't even bring myself to read that. Stupid post-exam brain drain.

*tries reading again and brain explodes*


heh.  I'm just glad I'm not the only one.  Paragraphs that long REALLY scare me, and I was somehow only able to read about a third of it.  I guess philosophy just isn't for me.  

56
General Chat / RE: Need Help With Winamp
« on: June 20, 2004, 11:13:39 AM »
I mostly agree with most everything you just said Metaphysical.  Except for one thing which just strikes me as wrong.

Quote

I also work with Mac and PCs at my college when doing computer animation. Pro-Graphic cards won't work on a Mac, there for the rendering process will take forever


That's grossly inaccurate.  I can see where having a nice 3D accelerator would help greatly in the design phase, where you are actually working with a 3D model in real time.  However, when the actual rendering comes in, I don't think which graphics card you have really bears any relevance.  It's ALL about the CPU power.  And that's something that a Mac will do FAR better than any PC given the vastly superior architecture.

57
General Chat / RE: Need Help With Winamp
« on: June 20, 2004, 10:26:19 AM »
Caillan, I figure that XMMS should work fine, given Mac OS X's UNIXie nature.  But of course, I haven't actually tried it myself. I am just hoping.    Pencils weren't used in the space program because it was feared that graphite would break off, and could potentially short out some of the electronics on the spacecraft.  It was a safety thing.  However, it was recently discovered that a regular ball point pen would work in space after all, so you aren't entirely wrong.  

58
General Chat / RE: Windowblinds skins for registered GC users
« on: June 20, 2004, 10:22:25 AM »
partial mirror:

http://people.uleth.ca/~dave.brady/GCN%20skins/

Can't guarantee that it stays up forever, but it should be there for the next couple of months or so, unless I really need my web space for something.  So if anyone wants to make a mirror, be my guest.

59
General Chat / RE: Need Help With Winamp
« on: June 18, 2004, 05:15:42 PM »
Syl, I personally use Winamp 2.95, but without the video playing stuff installed.    Winamp 5 is ok... but I don't really care for the bugginess of it, and it's a little slower than Winamp 2.  Besides, I honestly don't care about Winamp 3 skins at all.  2 does everything I want it to do.

I actually use WMP 9 to play all my video, thanks to the greatness of RealAlternative and QuicktimeAlternative.  I try to avoid Real and QT movies, but sometimes they are just unavoidable.

And yeah, I completely forgot about Winamp for Mac.  I have to say that from what I saw of it, I wasn't overly impressed though, and it seems to be discontinued anyways.  I would go for XMMS if I were you.  

60
General Chat / RE:G-mail
« on: June 17, 2004, 03:11:51 PM »
Quote

Originally posted by: Jale
It does indeed look good, but think how many servers and stuff they will need to offer that much to every user. Wow. Deep Thought, the city-sized supercomputer from the Hitchiker series springs to mind.


Google doesn't like to talk about their hardware.  But they have a huge staff of Computer Scientists, and a LOT of PhDs.

It's known that Google has a huge server farm running Linux though.  Each PC has a pair of 120GB hard drives I believe, and Google has thrown out a few numbers now and then, saying that they have tens of thousands of computers.  However, most believe this to be inaccurate, as they obviously have a LOT of computing power at their fingertips.  It's thought that they probably have servers numbering in the HUNDREDS of thousands.

What's really most amazing about Google though is how well they manage their server farm.  When it comes time to update their boxen, they ripple the updates through the machines in a way that makes any sysadmin cream his pants.  It's just a marvel of the world that it all actually works I tell ya.

61
General Chat / RE:Need Help With Winamp
« on: June 17, 2004, 03:05:22 PM »
Yeah, sorry.  My University's Internet Access is down for a few days for maintenance.  Apparently, the city is having problems with the fiber lines or something.

http://img78.photobucket.com/albums/v291/grey_ninja/screenshot.png

Try that instead.    Winamp is simplistic in nature.  It does the job it needs to do, and nothing more.  If you want bells and whistles, you get plugins.  In the screenshot though, you can see the simple sorting algorithms it has.  Sort by path and filename is the one that I use the most.  I ignore ID3 tags for the most part, but my file names are usually quite reasonable and well sorted.  So I just right click on my music folder, (which has subdirectories for SPCs, PSFs, USFs, and MP3/OGG/MP2s), and Winamp queues up all my songs.  I sort them by path and filename, then turn on shuffle mode for good measure.  I'm set for about a month.

But yeah... the G5 is certainly quite a machine.  But to be honest, I would much rather have one of these babies powering my rig.  

http://www.ncix.com/products/index.php?sku=12058&vpn=ADA3800AWBOX&manufacture=AM

62
General Chat / RE:Firefox 0.9 released
« on: June 16, 2004, 07:41:55 PM »
Quote

Originally posted by: Berny
Well Firefox 0.9 is definitely better than the previous version. As Gibdo said, it is faster, and I've gotten used to the ugly theme already. Perhaps the Mac theme looks a little different than the PC. Oh and thanks for the update, Gibdo.


Actually, the new theme is cross-platform IIRC.  The old way, Qute was used in Windows/Linux, but Macs had their own theme.  Due to licensing problems, Qute was dropped in Windows/Linux, and the Mac theme was modified to suit all platforms.  The theme is in quite an early stage though, and it's not really suited well for Windows.  

Windows generally favors more gradient based smooth artwork, with very little/no shadows.  While Macs favor the simplistic coloring, and more shadows and angles in their artwork.

I just installed Qute and was done with it.  

63
General Chat / RE:Need Help With Winamp
« on: June 16, 2004, 07:35:09 PM »
Berny, just thought I would show you something.

http://people.uleth.ca/~dave.brady/screenshot.png

Winamp.

I think what you really fail to understand is the entirely different concepts between iTunes and Winamp.  Winamp was truly the work of a single man.  A classic old school hacker employed by AOL.  Like all good programmers, he believed in svelt simplistic code, and blazingly fast results.  His pinnacle of creation was Winamp.  Quite nearly the ultimate piece of software from a programming perspective.  (And Firefox is closing in on it, as it is programmed with the EXACT SAME style...)

When it ships, it plays all the basic media types that you might expect a music player to play.  But it has a powerful extension API, so a clever programmer can extend it to do pretty much whatever he/she wishes.  And given the userbase of Winamp... there are a LOT of programmers interested in doing just that.  There are plugins to control a blinking array of LEDs, control floodlights, and hell, there's even plugins to make the lights on your keyboard blink in time with the music.

But personally, what I like most about Winamp is the wide array of music input plugins that there are.  If it's a music file of some sort, there IS a Winamp plugin to play it.  It's really that simple.

By the way... the tracks you see in Winamp there are PSFs.  They aren't mini PSFs, so they are larger than they need be.  But the entire soundtrack is about 2 and a half hours long.  (But you can change the length of the songs arbitrarily as you see fit, without adjusting file size).  Total size on my hard drive is 13.7MB (unzipped... which they honestly don't need to be)

------------------------------


But that being said...  If Apple were to port Mac OS X to PC, I might just jump ship anyways.  Mac OS X is about the most desktop friendly *NIX distro that there is.  The problem I have is that if I move to a Mac for real, I am trapped in the architecture that Apple wants me to have.  Now this is kind of the dual edged swords that Macs have to bear.  On the one hand, knowing what sort of hardware is going to be in the computer allows Macs to optimize things almost to the point of a Mac being more akin to a console than a PC.  But on the other hand, it is intended to be a general purpose computer.  Not allowing users to fully customize their rigs is a huge turnoff to a lot of PC users (myself included).  With my PC specs... I have trouble even getting Linux running.  

But seriously, try out XMMS sometime.   It's the *NIX version of Winamp.  It's halfways compatible with Winamp... it uses Winamp 2.xx skins (as in the one in the screenshot above), but as *NIX variants don't use DLLs, the plugin system is completely different.  Nevertheless, plugins for the more common music formats are easy to come by.

64
General Chat / RE: Get your custom title here
« on: June 15, 2004, 06:05:09 PM »
<font color="#990099">Retired Forum Drunk </font>

Please.  

65
General Chat / RE: Need Help With Winamp
« on: June 15, 2004, 02:49:05 PM »
You know, a lot of people have been saying stuff like that to me recently.  You would be AMAZED at how many people in the last couple of weeks have told me that I am just acting a lot nicer than normal, or being more optimistic.  I wish you would all just lay down and die.  =P  And that's BEFORE I tell them that I quit drinking.  (yeah, I like to kick people when they're down.)

Man, I still can't believe it actually.  There are 2 Windows programs that are ALWAYS installed first thing on a reformat of Windows.  One of them is Winamp 2.xx, and the other is Mozilla Firefox.  A distant third would be Trillian Pro.  You insulted one of the most universally accepted GOOD Windows programs, and I cheered you on.  

What's this world coming to?  Man, I tell ya.  If I was just a little bit younger, I would have scalped you and eaten your entrails for breakfast.  Now, here I am about ready to hug you for taking up the software fanaticism where I left off.    Where the hell is my rascal?  I have to go throw bread at the pigeons and yell at the kids in the park.

But yeah, keep up the good work mate.  

66
General Gaming / RE: MGS2: Substance PC version
« on: June 15, 2004, 02:30:31 PM »
I've been thinking about it, and I remember now that it was Silent Hill 3 that I was really impressed with in terms of controls.  I didn't even need to customize the button layout.  It was absolutely amazing.  The controller worked JUST LIKE it would have on a PS2.

Metal Gear Solid 2 required a fair bit of configuring to get working properly, and there were two moves I couldn't do on the controller.  But they were fairly non-critical, and I could live without them.  (I found missing them to be about the same level of annoyingness as actually HAVING them on the real controller).

You know, I really hate to admit this, but I bought the PC version well after playing the PS2 version.  I bought it knowing full well that the game would stink up my room and bring dishonor to my PC.  But you know... that first level can last a fairly long time if you REALLY draw it out... and the VR missions are kind of fun.  (But I had my fill of the VR stuff with MGS: Integral).  I figured I could get my $25 worth if I just played the first level repeatedly.  And you know what?  Other than the nasty taste I get in my mouth every time I think about actually giving money to Kojima for the pile of crap in CD form...  I don't regret it that much.

Just some emphasis on this...

Quote

Dearest Genome Soldier: Having a wonderful time, wish you were here.  With love, Solid Snake: Well... the tanker and the VR missions are good.
Dearest Genome Soldier: Having a wonderful time, wish you were here.  With love, Solid Snake: But the actual game itself sucks more ass than a hooker in a gay-bar
I eat people.  I'm a humanitarian : werent a fan of MGS2?
Dearest Genome Soldier: Having a wonderful time, wish you were here.  With love, Solid Snake: nope.
Dearest Genome Soldier: Having a wonderful time, wish you were here.  With love, Solid Snake: not in the slightest
I eat people.  I'm a humanitarian : yah... it was a sad attempt of a sequel...
Dearest Genome Soldier: Having a wonderful time, wish you were here.  With love, Solid Snake: I have high hopes for MGS3
Dearest Genome Soldier: Having a wonderful time, wish you were here.  With love, Solid Snake: (although... I really hate to admit this, but I do own a copy of MGS2)
Dearest Genome Soldier: Having a wonderful time, wish you were here.  With love, Solid Snake: (I REALLY liked the Tanker stage)
I eat people.  I'm a humanitarian : meh... that's a true fan

67
General Chat / RE:Need Help With Winamp
« on: June 14, 2004, 06:52:27 PM »
Quote

Originally posted by: Berny
What, pro-Mac posting? Nevar! I'll break TEH RULZ!

(Fine, no screenshot. )


LMAO!  Man, you seem to have picked up right where I left off.  That's a totally awesome response.

But that being said, I very much dislike the lack of expansion possible with iTunes.  I play music regularly in about 10 different file formats.  iTunes is great if all you listen to is AC3, MP3, and CDA... but I just find that cutting off other music types akin to blowing away half your foot.

Plus, I just like the simplicity and speed of Winamp.  iTunes doesn't hold a candle to it in those terms.  Since you are a Mac user, of course you can't use Winamp itself.  But since Mac OS X is very close to *NIX systems, you might want to try out XMMS sometime.  It's not as full featured as Winamp, and it's a fair bit slower, but I think that it would at least give you some grounds upon which to rag on Winamp, if you so chose.  =P

http://www.macosxapps.com/article.php?story=20010824090429860

You can find it there.

68
General Gaming / RE: MGS2: Substance PC version
« on: June 13, 2004, 12:34:42 PM »
yes.  I tried it, and it works unbelievably well...  But that being said, the game still sucks.  A disgrace to the name.

69
General Chat / RE:Stephen King
« on: June 13, 2004, 12:33:07 PM »
Quote

Originally posted by: The Time Professor
The thing about King is that he has a lot of bad books to go along with his good ones.  I haven't read much of his stuff but i would recommend The Stand and the Dark Tower series.  Both chill books.


Mod parent up, +5 correct.

I bought the Dark Tower 6 the other day and I have to say that it is quite good.  My second favorite so far, next to book 3...

70
General Gaming / RE:Silicon Knights developing a Xbox title?
« on: May 24, 2004, 02:27:44 PM »
I saw this yesterday.  I spent the day mulling it over.

There's one of 4 possibilities.

1)  Xbox is getting a port of Eternal Darkness or MGS: TTS
2)  Xbox isn't getting anything, and The Magic Box is wrong.  (because I couldn't find another site to report the same thing)
3)  Xbox is getting something completely new.
4)  Denis is wearing a money hat.

I would personally applaud Eternal Darkness coming out on Xbox, as it would show the franchise to a few more gamers.  That way when an exclusive sequel came out on GameCube, it would sell really really well.

Xbox not getting anything would get a cheer out of me.  PS2 getting something new instead would probably have me down at the store buying one, and being VERY unhappy about it.

Xbox getting something completely new would have me more angry than any of you have ever seen me.

Denis wearing a money hat would of course cause me to completely disavow Silicon Knights.  Much as it would break my heart to do so.

71
system's not even out, and already the piracy starts.    Reminds me of poor GBA.

72
General Chat / RE:Hippy Music (and Movies)!
« on: April 24, 2004, 02:51:35 PM »
http://www.eagames.com/official/battlefield/vietnam/us/radio.jsp

This game is bloody incredible.  There just isn't much better than flying around in a Cobra blowing stuff while listening to the sounds of the 60s.  Now if only some developer would make an "Extreme Vietnamese Sports" game, I would be a HAPPY man indeed.  =)  I would RULE at gunboat waterskiing.

Man...  It's just amazing how powerful some of this stuff is.  Yes Ms. Pikmin, I think that the music has given me the message.  =)

73
TalkBack / RE:PGC's 5th Birthday Contest - The Winners!
« on: April 18, 2004, 09:14:59 AM »
Well, as I DID enter the contest, I figure it's only polite to pop in here and congratulate the winners.  Your entries definitely put mine to shame.  (Although I suppose even Final Fantasy X-2 would put mine to shame... and of course, the treat the neighborhood dog left in my yard puts THAT to shame.)  I saw some of the flash movie in first place, and could kind of get the gist of it, but I haven't seen the movies yet, as I am simply not prepared to wait 3 days for them to download.  

So... any chance that any of you winners would like to sell your signed copy of MGS: TTS to one of us losers?  

Anyways, some of you have seen mine already.  It kinda... sucks... but it's here:
http://people.uleth.ca/~dave.brady/New/PGC2.gba

It doesn't seem to like the newest version of VBA much, but I developed and tested it on VBA 0.9a, as I am still unable to find a flash cart for a reasonable price.  It totally sucks, and you are totally free to laugh at it all you like, but I maintain that it's not THAT bad for being coded in about 5-10 hours or so.  And most of that was actually spent making/finding/converting graphics and sound.  Not to mention that I never wrote a line of code that appeared in the final version without being under the influence of at least some alcohol.  

But aside from the intro, the whole thing did not turn out at all like my design document stated.  I was going to have some South Park style animation, walking through the site, and stuff of that sort.

And yeah, I realize that this being the second time in a week that I have posted here, some people might be thinking I am on my way back in.  Well, I'm NOT.  So you can keep your thoughts to yourself.

PS:  yellowfellow, everyone knows that you are using IE because it's pretty much the crappiest browser out there, and if you were using a more modern browser, then you wouldn't be complaining about popups.

74
TalkBack / RE: Silicon Knights Breaks with Nintendo
« on: April 13, 2004, 06:24:09 PM »
Worst news since Square left.  I am quite seriously a mess right now, which explains my presence here.  I haven't even visited these forums for about a month.  I would do ANYTHING for this news to not be true.

75
Nintendo Gaming / RE: Gamecubes Graphics
« on: December 24, 2003, 06:50:17 PM »
Fair enough.  Unfortunately I lack the advanced 3D graphics knowledge to fully understand why this would be the case, but I suppose I will take your word on it.  

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 145