1
Movies & TV / Re: Hey! DC's got stuff too... (Official Thread for the DCU of Movies and TV)
« on: December 25, 2024, 02:09:01 AM »
Yeaaaaah! I'm sure ya'll seen the trailer. I'm excited.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
No it's basically how you post. You come in every couple of weeks and bump your tired old threads from weeks, months or even years ago with a pointless comment. It's not you as a person per se, but how you post around the forum.
Dont worry Perm, I still like ya.
You and your boyfriends first made the claim that piracy hurts game sales before me.Your logical fallacy is [ad hominem].
BTW, this started because you first claimed that piracy is morally correct. There's no point in discussing this further when you've Neo-dodged every criticism about the original claim.QuoteStealing implies someone had something taken from them. Piracy never takes the original game away from the dev, it just makes a copy. You're talking about nintendo like they're a starving indie company when they're the richest company in japan period.Your logical fallacy is [strawman].QuoteThey have sold over 140 million switches, made over 1 billion dollars of profit on software sales and the switch is on pace to become the best selling console of all time. I think they won't lose sleep if a few million pirate their games, especially as the switch has been pirated day one.Your logical fallacy is [special pleading].
Won't lose sleep? Nintendo literally sued Yuzu into oblivion because of people pirating Tears of the Kingdom.QuoteIf piracy hurt sales as you pretend it does, the switch would of failed.Your (informal) logical fallacy is [false dilemma].QuoteAt least someone here comprehends how piracy preserves old games. But tbh yall sound like boomers who bought the "you wouldn't steal a car" anti piracy campaigns, and can't move on and accept that publishers do a piss poor job of providing access to their legacy titles.LOL, no one was saying otherwise (though there's more nuance than you presented). The difference is you're the only one claiming its "morally correct".