We store cookies, you can get more info from our privacy policy.

Politicians Praise ESRB's New Ratings Summaries

by Neal Ronaghan - November 17, 2008, 7:16 pm EST
Total comments: 10 Source: ESRB

The ESRB has added "ratings summaries" to their game ratings, gaining applause from Senators Hillary Clinton and Joseph Lieberman.

The Entertainment Software Rating Board recently unveiled their newest addition to their ratings system: ratings summaries. The summaries "explain in objective terms the context and relevant content that factored into a game’s ESRB rating assignment." The ESRB has stated that all games released after July 1, 2008 will have ratings summaries. Strangely enough, Nintendo's recent Wii game, Animal Crossing: City Folk, does not currently have a ratings summary. For an example of a ratings summary, here is the summary for the upcoming Teen-rated Wii release, Deadly Creatures:

Deadly Creatures is an action adventure game in which players can assume the roles of an armored scorpion and a tarantula spider as they move through desert terrain and underground passages. Players can inject creatures (e.g., Gila monsters, horned lizards, praying mantis, etc.) with poison, infest an area, cast deadly webs and destroy various rats, beetles, and snakes with their tails. Red blood is emitted from the reptiles or rats when attacked. There is a reference to alcohol in the dialogue (e.g., "…he was a drunk."), and mild profanity can be heard throughout the game (e.g., "goddamn," "bastard," and "son of a b*tch").

Long-time ESRB critics Senator Hillary Clinton and Senator Joseph Lieberman both approve of the new ratings summaries, with Clinton saying that "the ratings [are] a real gift for parents as we head into this holiday season." Lieberman even goes to say that he "[applauds] the ESRB for taking this proactive step to inform video game consumers."

Senator Lieberman's crusade against video games began before the ESRB's formation. In 1994, he and Senator Herbert Kohl stood before the U.S. Senate and called out Mortal Kombat and Night Trap's extreme violence and marketing. The Senate's conclusion at the end of that hearing was that the video game industry needed to create a rating system within the year or else the government would intervene. After a few company-specific ratings systems, like Sega's Videogame Rating Council, the ESRB was established and approved by Congress. Years later, Lieberman continued his war against video game violence during the Grand Theft Auto series' rise to popularity. He even tried to go as far as to make selling or renting a video game to a minor a federal crime.

Senator Clinton joined the fray shortly after. She saw games as a "major threat" to morality and went on to say that "children are playing a game that encourages them to have sex with prostitutes and then murder them. This is a silent epidemic of media desensitization that teaches kids it's OK to diss people because they are a woman, they're a different color or they're from a different place."

Thankfully, the two Senators seem to be appeased by the ESRB's latest addition. Only time will tell if they are truly satisfied with ratings summaries or not.

Talkback

EnnerNovember 18, 2008

Now, hopefully all parents will read the descriptions throughly before deciding to purchase.

King of TwitchNovember 18, 2008

This article is funny for so many reasons.

DAaaMan64November 18, 2008

boo

ShyGuyNovember 18, 2008

Yay, let's discuss politics. NO POLITICS The description seemed well written though.

Quote:

Hillary Clinton and Joseph Lieberman

UltimatePartyBearNovember 18, 2008

I don't know where they're going to find room to print that description, but it's certainly a good idea.

Quote from: nron10

Thankfully, the two Senators seem to be appeased by the ESRB's latest addition. Only time will tell if they are truly satisfied with ratings summaries or not.

They have to act appeased because they don't really want the government involved in game regulation.  With the industry policing itself, it makes an easy target to rail against after some idiot with a Rockstar game in his house kills someone.  Their voters see them doing something "for the good of the people" and reelect them.  If the government was responsible for regulating games, every random killing blamed on games would cost them votes instead.

DAaaMan64November 18, 2008

Quote from: UltimatePartyBear

They have to act appeased because they don't really want the government involved in game regulation.

Quote:

Hillary Clinton and Joseph Lieberman

AH HA HA HA HA HA HA

UltimatePartyBearNovember 18, 2008

I'm aware of the politicians in question.  If they really did want government regulation of video games, they would not be appeased by anything the ESRB did.  That they are willing to back down at all reveals their real motivation.

Ian SaneNovember 18, 2008

Apparently some of these ratings summaries have spoilers in them.

I'm just waiting for this big blurb of text to start appearing on the box.  The whole case will just be a glut of warnings.  Warnings about content.  Warnings about seizures.  Warnings about obesity.  Warnings about videogame addiction.  Warnings about wrist damage, neck damage, eye damage.  Warnings about throwing the controller across the room and hitting someone in the face.

KDR_11kNovember 18, 2008

Yeah, half the box already seems to be covered in warnings, especially on smaller boxes like those used for GBA and DS games.

DAaaMan64November 19, 2008

Quote from: UltimatePartyBear

I'm aware of the politicians in question.  If they really did want government regulation of video games, they would not be appeased by anything the ESRB did.  That they are willing to back down at all reveals their real motivation.

Okay, you may be. But I guarantee this is just another way to get the ball rolling.

"So and so says this!"

Got a news tip? Send it in!
Advertisement
Advertisement